Archive for January, 2006

Economic costs of the war

Thanks to InformationClearinghouse, the complete text of the Linda Bilmes & Joseph E. Stiglitz study, estimating costs for the war conservatively at $1-$2 trillion is now available: The economic costs of the Iraq war: An appraisal three years after the beginning of the conflict. I noticed that the study was reported in the Boston Globe, but far from the front page. One might think that a trillion or two dollars might get some attention, but….

Add comment January 8th, 2006

Crushing the testicles of suspects’ children is legal: What we have come to

In a December 1 debate between (former) Bush administration torture defender deputy assistant to Attorney General John Yoo and Notre Dame professor Doug Cassel
Bush Advisor Says President Has Legal Power to Torture Children
, including crushing
the testicles of a suspect’s child:

Cassel: If the President deems that he’s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child, there is no law that can stop him?

Yoo: No treaty.

Cassel: Also no law by Congress. That is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo.

Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.

Remember, this is no academic debate. Yoo has one of the principal architects of US policy for the decades-long Global War on Terror in general, and foe Guantanamo, renditions, and Iraq in particlar.

Link to audio of debate.

Add comment January 8th, 2006

The surveillance state takes another step

Do you ever call someone that you would not like to be public knowledge? For $110 anyone can buy a list of all your phone calls, reports the Chicago Sun-Times! [Your phone records are for sale].

If you’re not worried, imagine this:

“Suspicious spouses can see if their husband or wife is calling a certain someone a bit too often.

And employers can check whether a worker is regularly calling a psychologist — or a competing company.”

Just in case you thought otherwise, this is apparently not illegal.

1 comment January 7th, 2006

Purity and the horny GI

Terrified that lonely, sexually frustrated GIs in Iraq will turn to pornography and (gasp!) masturbation, the fundamentalist Christian New Life Ministries is kindly making available kits to promote purity:

“The kits — from New Life Ministries, which broadcasts on 150 stations nationwide — promote Bible-based abstinence: no pornography, adultery, nonmarital sex or masturbation.”

“’ Your goal is sexual purity,’ the text says. ‘You are sexually pure when no sexual gratification comes from anyone or anything but your wife.’”

“Each kit comes with an ‘Every Man’s Battle’ book and workbook for men or an ‘Every Woman’s Battle’ book and workbook for women, plus a Bible study guide and a daily devotional.”

These books are carefully designed to combat the dangers to the soul so prevalent in Iraqi bases:

“”Even while we were in Iraq, the pervasion of this problem was evident — soldiers had porno CDs they could play on their personal DVDs, and they had sexually suggestive magazines ‘graciously’ donated for the soldiers’ entertainment,” Brandt said. “The problem is an age-old one with the military: Soldiers are far away from home for a long time, sexual frustration sets in, and the visual stimuli become the easiest release.””

Add comment January 7th, 2006

Wounded vets, narcissism, and the President

President Bush spoke last week to wounded soldiers at Brooke Army Medical Center and uttered these immortal words, indicating a lack of true appreciation for the suffering of the gravely wounded, often permanently disabled soldiers he was speaking to:

“As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself — not here at the hospital, but in combat with a Cedar. I eventually won. The Cedar gave me a little scratch. As a matter of fact, the Colonel asked if I needed first aid when she first saw me. I was able to avoid any major surgical operations here, but thanks for your compassion, Colonel.”

This was far from the first time Bush uttered bizarre sounding comments in response to the injuries of others. For some perspective on his behavior, compare what is known about him with the and Statistical Manual (IVth edition: DSM-IV) definition of narcissistic personality disorder [for clarification, I am not suggesting that this diagnosis be applied to President Bus. One should be extremely cautious about diagnosing people at a distance, based only on public, filtered, data.]:

“A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy.”

It is diagnosed by the presence of at leat five of these nine criteria:

“Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

Believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

Requires excessive admiration

Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes”

Whether or not a particular diagnosis fits, this comparison certainly suggests that the President has narcissistic tendencies, which may be both his strength and his undoing.

2 comments January 7th, 2006

Human avian flu arrives in Europe

While it’s not a major crisis so far, it is significant that avian flu has now infected people in Europe, killing one: Turkey diagnoses human bird flu.

Add comment January 4th, 2006

Bush reserves right to torture, despite ban

The Boston Globe reports today [Bush could bypass torture ban] that President Bush issued a ‘’signing statement” (as recomended decades ago by Alito) reserving the right to torture despite the Congressional ban:

After approving the bill last Friday, Bush issued a ‘’signing statement” — an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law — declaring that he will view the interrogation limits in the context of his broader powers to protect national security. This means Bush believes he can waive the restrictions, the White House and legal specialists said.

”The executive branch shall construe [the law] in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President . . . as Commander in Chief,” Bush wrote, adding that this approach ”will assist in achieving the shared objective of the Congress and the President . . . of protecting the American people from further terrorist attacks….”

David Golove, a New York University law professor who specializes in executive power issues, said that the signing statement means that Bush believes he can still authorize harsh interrogation tactics when he sees fit.

”The signing statement is saying ‘I will only comply with this law when I want to, and if something arises in the war on terrorism where I think it’s important to torture or engage in cruel, inhuman, and degrading conduct, I have the authority to do so and nothing in this law is going to stop me,’ ” he said. ”They don’t want to come out and say it directly because it doesn’t sound very nice, but it’s unmistakable to anyone who has been following what’s going on.”

If allowed to stand, this will be a total assertion that the President is above the law. If Sen. McCain doesn’t move to impeach, we will know that his ban was just for show, and not intended to actually impede US behavior.

Add comment January 4th, 2006

Evolutionary biology: Why I’m happy I evolved

Today’s New York Times has an excellent article on the excitement and wonders of evolutionary biology by Olivia Judson of Imperial College, London: Why I’m Happy I Evolved. Reprinted here:

IF chimpanzees observed New Year’s Day, they would have much to reflect on. In 2005, they joined humans, chickens and mosquitoes, as well as less famous occupants of the planet, on an exclusive but growing list: organisms whose complete genomes have been sequenced.

What would they make of this news, I wonder? Perhaps they would resent the genetic evidence that they are related to us. Or perhaps they would, as I do, revel in being part of the immensity of nature and a product of evolution, the same process that gave rise to dinosaurs, bread molds and myriad organisms too wacky to invent.

Organisms like the sea slug Elysia chlorotica. This animal not only looks like a leaf, but it also acts like one, making energy from the sun. Its secret? When it eats algae, it extracts the chloroplasts, the tiny entities that plants and algae use to manufacture energy from sunlight, and shunts them into special cells beneath its skin. The chloroplasts continue to function; the slug thus becomes able to live on a diet composed only of sunbeams.

Still more fabulous is the bacterium Brocadia anammoxidans. It blithely makes a substance that to most organisms is a lethal poison - namely, hydrazine. That’s rocket fuel.

And then there’s the wasp Cotesia congregata. She injects her eggs into the bodies of caterpillars. As she does so, she also injects a virus that disables the caterpillar’s immune system and prevents it from attacking the eggs. When the eggs hatch, the larvae eat the caterpillar alive.

It’s hard not to have an insatiable interest in organisms like these, to be enthralled by the strangeness, the complexity, the breathtaking variety of nature.

Just think: the Indus River dolphin doesn’t sleep as you or I do, or indeed as most mammals, for several hours at once. Instead, it takes microsleeps, naps that last for a few seconds, like a driver dozing at the wheel.

Or consider this: a few days after its conception, a pig embryo has become a filament that is about a yard long.

Or: the single-celled parasite that causes malaria is descended from algae. We know this because it carries within itself the remnants of a chloroplast.

It’s not that I have a fetish for obscure facts. It’s that small facts add up to big pictures. For although Mother Nature’s infinite variety seems incomprehensible at first, it is not. The forces of nature are not random; often, they are strongly predictable.

For example, if you were to discover a new species and you told me that the male is much bigger than the female, I would tell you what the mating system is likely to be: males fight each other for access to females. Or if you discover that the male’s testicles make up a large part of his weight, I can tell you that the females in his species consort with several males at a time.

Suppose you find that a particular bacterium lives exclusively in the gullets of leeches and helps them digest blood. Then I can tell you how that bacterium’s genome is likely to differ from those of its free-living cousins; among other changes, the genome will be smaller, and it will have lost sets of genes that are helpful for living free but useless for living inside another being.

Because a cell is a kind of factory that produces proteins, and because proteins can have a variety of components, some of which are cheaper to synthesize than others, you might expect that proteins that are mass produced are made from cheaper components than proteins that are constructed only occasionally. And you’d be right.

The patterns are everywhere. Mammals that feed on ants and termites have typically evolved long, thin noses and long, sticky tongues. A virus that is generally passed from mother to child will tend to make its host less sick than one that readily jumps from one host to another via a cough or a sneeze.

When I was in school, I learned none of this. Biology was a subject that seemed as exciting as a clump of cotton wool. It was a dreary exercise in the memorization and regurgitation of apparently unconnected facts. Only later did I learn about evolution and how it transforms biology from that mass of cotton wool into a magnificent tapestry, a tapestry we can contemplate and begin to understand.

Some people want to think of humans as the product of a special creation, separate from other living things. I am not among them; I am glad it is not so. I am proud to be part of the riot of nature, to know that the same forces that produced me also produced bees, giant ferns and microbes that live at the bottom of the sea.

For me, the knowledge that we evolved is a source of solace and hope. I find it a relief that plagues and cancers and wasp larvae that eat caterpillars alive are the result of the impartial - and comprehensible - forces of evolution rather than the caprices of a deity.

More than that, I find that in viewing ourselves as one species out of hundreds of millions, we become more remarkable, not less so. No other animal that I have heard of can live so peaceably in such close quarters with so many individuals that are unrelated. No other animal routinely bothers to help the sick and the dying, or tries to save those hurt in an earthquake or flood.

Which is not to say that we are all we might wish to be. But in putting ourselves into our place in nature, in comparing ourselves with other species, we have a real hope of reaching a better understanding, and appreciation, of ourselves.

Add comment January 1st, 2006

Next Posts


Pages

Calendar

January 2006
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category