<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq Body Count replies to critics but ignores criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2006/03/29/iraq-body-count-replies-to-critics-but-ignores-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2006/03/29/iraq-body-count-replies-to-critics-but-ignores-criticism/</link>
	<description>Thoughts by Stephen Soldz on war, peace, politics, psychoanalysis, and research methods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:11:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Bidder</title>
		<link>http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2006/03/29/iraq-body-count-replies-to-critics-but-ignores-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>George Bidder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2006/03/29/iraq-body-count-replies-to-critics-but-ignores-criticism/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;I, in turn argued that there was no reason to believe that the Western press was reporting most, or even a majority of war-related deaths in Iraq.&quot;&gt;

Nice straw man...

Since when was:

Al Jaz - Al Jazeera network
HT - Hindustan Times
JT - Jordan Times
MEN - Middle East Newsline
MEO - Middle East Online
MER - Middle East Report

described as &quot;Western Press&quot;?

Your argument appears to be based on the assumption that IBC&#039;s data *relies* on &quot;Western&quot; sources.

This is clearly incorrect. I&#039;ll leave you with the embarrassing task of working out exactly *how* incorrect...&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="I, in turn argued that there was no reason to believe that the Western press was reporting most, or even a majority of war-related deaths in Iraq.">
<p>Nice straw man&#8230;</p>
<p>Since when was:</p>
<p>Al Jaz &#8211; Al Jazeera network<br />
HT &#8211; Hindustan Times<br />
JT &#8211; Jordan Times<br />
MEN &#8211; Middle East Newsline<br />
MEO &#8211; Middle East Online<br />
MER &#8211; Middle East Report</p>
<p>described as &#8220;Western Press&#8221;?</p>
<p>Your argument appears to be based on the assumption that IBC&#8217;s data *relies* on &#8220;Western&#8221; sources.</p>
<p>This is clearly incorrect. I&#8217;ll leave you with the embarrassing task of working out exactly *how* incorrect&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pjotr</title>
		<link>http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2006/03/29/iraq-body-count-replies-to-critics-but-ignores-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Pjotr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2006/03/29/iraq-body-count-replies-to-critics-but-ignores-criticism/#comment-462</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve got a lucrative job going on. They have more important things to do than answer to critizism.

&quot;If you are not offending people who ought to be offended, you&#039;re doing something wrong.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve got a lucrative job going on. They have more important things to do than answer to critizism.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you are not offending people who ought to be offended, you&#8217;re doing something wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
