Comments on: Games of the Parisian intellectuals http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2007/02/07/games-of-the-parisian-intellectuals/ Thoughts by Stephen Soldz on war, peace, politics, psychoanalysis, and research methods Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:11:54 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Dr. X's Free Associations http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2007/02/07/games-of-the-parisian-intellectuals/comment-page-1/#comment-30185 Dr. X's Free Associations Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:21:03 +0000 http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2007/02/07/games-of-the-parisian-intellectuals/#comment-30185 <strong>Who Needs Cliffs Notes? Hell, Who Needs Books?...</strong> Psychoanalyst Stephen Soldz has an interesting post about a startling admission by a French psychoanalytically-oriented literary critic who says that he often discusses books he has never read without others catching on to his deception. Pierre Bayard,... Who Needs Cliffs Notes? Hell, Who Needs Books?…

Psychoanalyst Stephen Soldz has an interesting post about a startling admission by a French psychoanalytically-oriented literary critic who says that he often discusses books he has never read without others catching on to his deception. Pierre Bayard,…

]]> By: Jack Shalom http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2007/02/07/games-of-the-parisian-intellectuals/comment-page-1/#comment-30177 Jack Shalom Thu, 08 Feb 2007 03:40:52 +0000 http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2007/02/07/games-of-the-parisian-intellectuals/#comment-30177 Let's see now . . . if I don't read the book and call it b.s., then I'm confirming the author's viewpoint that I don't have to read a book to talk about it; but since that confirms the author's point, then his viewpoint isn't b.s. . . A most ingenious paradox! Thank goodness no one will have to read this comment to comment on it. Let’s see now . . . if I don’t read the book and call it b.s., then I’m confirming the author’s viewpoint that I don’t have to read a book to talk about it; but since that confirms the author’s point, then his viewpoint isn’t b.s. . . A most ingenious paradox! Thank goodness no one will have to read this comment to comment on it.

]]>