Monbiot on 9/11 conspiracies
February 20th, 2007
George Monbiot reminds us how fantastic, silly, and harmful the 9/11 conspiracy folks are:
To qualify as a true opponent of the Bush regime, you must also now believe that it is capable of magic. It could blast the Pentagon with a cruise missile while persuading hundreds of onlookers that they saw a plane. It could wire every floor of the twin towers with explosives without attracting attention and prime the charges (though planes had ploughed through the middle of the sequence) to drop each tower in a perfectly timed collapse. It could make Flight 93 disappear into thin air, and somehow ensure that the relatives of the passengers collaborated with the deception. It could recruit tens of thousands of conspirators to participate in these great crimes and induce them all to have kept their mouths shut, for ever.
In other words, you must believe that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their pals are all-knowing, all-seeing and all-powerful, despite the fact that they were incapable of faking either weapons of mass destruction or any evidence at Ground Zero that Saddam Hussein was responsible. You must believe that the impression of cackhandedness and incompetence they have managed to project since taking office is a front. Otherwise you are a traitor and a spy.
Moniot speculates that the driving force behind the conspiracy beliefs is a desire for powerlessness:
The obvious corollorary to the belief that the Bush administration is all-powerful is that the rest of us are completely powerless. In fact it seems to me that the purpose of the “9/11 truth movement” is to be powerless. The omnipotence of the Bush regime is the coward’s fantasy, an excuse for inaction used by those who don’t have the stomach to engage in real political fights.
Let me give you an example. The column I wrote about Loose Change two weeks ago generated 777 posts on the Guardian Comment is Free website, which is almost a record. Most of them were furious. The response from a producer of the film, published last week, attracted 467. On the same day the Guardian published my article about a genuine, demonstrable conspiracy: a spy network feeding confidential information from an arms control campaign to Britain’s biggest weapons manufacturer, BAE Systems. It drew 60 responses. The members of the 9/11 cult weren’t interested. If they had been, they might have had to do something. The great virtue of a fake conspiracy is that it calls on you to do nothing.
The 9/11 conspiracy theories are a displacement activity. A displacement activity is something you do because you feel incapable of doing what you ought to do. A squirrel sees a larger squirrel stealing its horde of nuts. Instead of attacking its rival, it sinks its teeth into a tree and starts ripping it to pieces. Faced with the mountainous challenge of the real issues we must confront, the chickens in the “truth” movement focus instead on a fairytale, knowing that nothing they do or say will count, knowing that because the perpetrators don’t exist, they can’t fight back. They demonstrate their courage by repeatedly bayoneting a scarecrow.
Monbiot makes clear how dangerous he feels these folks are:
The 9/11 truthers remind me of nothing so much as the climate change deniers, cherry-picking their evidence, seizing any excuse for ignoring the arguments of their opponents. Witness the respondents to my Loose Change column who maintain that the magazine Popular Mechanics, which has ripped the demolition theories apart, is a government front. They know this because one of its editors, Benjamin Chertoff, is the brother/nephew/first cousin of the US homeland security secretary Michael Chertoff. (They are, as far as Benjamin can discover, unrelated, but what does he know?)
Like the millenarian fantasies which helped to destroy the Levellers as a political force in the mid-17th century, this crazy distraction presents a mortal danger to popular oppositional movements. If I were Bush or Blair, nothing would please me more than to see my opponents making idiots of themselves, while devoting their lives to chasing a phantom. But as a controlled asset of the new world order, I would say that, wouldn’t I? It’s all part of the plot.
Entry Filed under: Culture, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Social Issues
5 Comments Add your own
1. SanityForSale | February 21st, 2007 at 7:06 am
Article by Monbiot in Oct of 2001
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,574809,00.html
Its funny how old george changed his tune is it not? You being a psycoanalyst should know better.
Also have a look at this: http://sanityforsale.wordpress.com/2007/02/11/conclusive-proof-of-911-cover-up/
you being a scientist should ALWAYS take into account all the information. For you to just be rehashing what monbiot said is a eisservice to your profession.
2. Stephen Soldz | February 21st, 2007 at 8:13 am
The 2001 piece has nothing to do with the causes of 9/11. I see no evidence of change of tune. He’s still calling for radical critique. In his new piece, he’s pointing out that the 9/11 conspiracy theories are nothing of the sort.
3. SanityForSale | February 21st, 2007 at 10:32 am
So what did you make of the video of NIST lying through their teeth?
4. Sanity For Sale | February 26th, 2007 at 4:59 pm
what do you make of the new BBC archive video i have got on my blog?
5. Katie S. | February 28th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
You are entitled to your opinion. But there is no way in hell you can change my opinion of 9-11-2001. Is it no coincidence that Bush didn’t legitimately win either the 2000 or 2004 elections, 9-11 happened, and soon we found ourselves in a quagmire in Iraq and Afghanistan and in a cold war with North Korea and Iran?
If the mafia, CIA, racist southerners, Cuban exiles, and other right-wing extremists can fund, train, and arm militias in the U.S. to assassinate JFK in Dallas…THEN WHY is a conspiracy theory so hard for people to see with 9-11? The 11-story buildings should have taken at least 11 seconds to fall, but they fell at free fall speeds and collapsed into nice, neat little piles.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed