Archive for June 4th, 2007

PHR letter to Defense Secretary Gates

Physicians for Human Rights, in the wake of the OIG report,  has sent a letter to Defense Secretary Gates drawing out the implications of the report and asking for major changes in DoD policies regarding interrogations. As they describe it on their web site:

In a letter sent on May 31, 2007, to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, PHR responds to the recently declassified Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report, “Review of DoD-Directed Investigations of Detainee Abuse.” In the report, the OIG details how interrogation techniques used in recent years by the military were developed using techniques from the Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) program, a module designed to train military personnel in how to resist torture when captured by a ruthless enemy. The PHR letter calls on Secretary Gates to specifically ban techniques developed from the Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape program, to establish ethical guidelines for all health professionals involved in interrogations, and to declassify and release all additional materials pertaining to these matters.

The letter is a nice summary of the implications of the OIG report. They go on to discuss some positive changes in DoD policy since the OIG report was initially released in classified form:

However, these guidelines continue to call on military psychologists to play a central role in interrogations by BSCTs, fail to bind health professionals to their ethical obligations to “first do no harm,” and place clinicians in the Military Intelligence chain of command rather than within the Medical Department. This is a dangerous role to impose on mental health experts, one that led to the misappropriation of SERE psychological expertise in the first place, as documented by the OIG and others.

They go on to request additional changes in DoD policy:

PHR, therefore, respectfully urges you to take the following actions:

1. Fully implement the OIG’s recommendation to “preclude the use of Survival, Evasion, esistance, and Escape physical and psychological coercion techniques” in all interrogations. (Id, p. 29-30.) This includes rescission of Appendix M of the new Army Field Manual and specific rohibition, by name, of each of the known SERE-based methods and their equivalents.

2. Abolish the BSCTs and rescind the June 6, 2006 Department of Defense Instruction(Medical program Support for Detainee Operations), which established guidelines for the BSCTs and other health personnel. Establish new unambigious guidelines holding all health care professionals, regardless of their designated role or assignment, to the well-established health professional principle to prevent, avoid and minimize harm.

3. In the interest of transparency reflected in the declassification of the OIG Report, declassify and release all other documents shedding light on US interrogation policy and practices, including but not limited to SERE-based methods.

Add comment June 4th, 2007

Democracy Now! on the APA and torture

Friday on Democracy Now!, one segment — “The Task Force Report Should Be Annulled” - Member of 2005 APA Task Force on Psychologist Participation in Military Interrogations Speaks Out –was devoted to the American Psychological Association in light of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) report documenting psychologists at the center of US torture. On the show were Jean Maria Arrigo and Nina Thomas; two of the three non-military/intelligence members of the APA’s PENS Task Force. Also on the show was Leonard Rubenstein, Executive Director of Physicians for Human Rights and Eric Anders, a psychoanalyst who experienced SERE first-hand.

Arrigo has called for the PENS report to be rescinded. As she states:

“I came later to realize that the entire report had been orchestrated”

Thomas, while uncomfortable about aspects of PENS, spouts the latest APA spin that the Task Force was created because of the whistle-blowing of Michael Gelles, also Task Force member. This seems to be a new claim, one generated in the post-OIG era, when APA can no longer say the psychologists keep interrogations “safe, legal, and ethical” with a straight face. Now their latest spin is to point to all the military and intelligence psychologists who, allegedly, worked to avoid torture. This despite years of APA telling us how the BSCTs were really “safety officers,” keeping interrogators from going too far. The OIG report document, rather, that the psychologists consulted to interrogators on how to develop especially torturous abusive techniques. But APA and truth got divorced years ago.

Listen, watch, or read the show here.

1 comment June 4th, 2007


Pages

Calendar

June 2007
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category