Archive for April 14th, 2008

Sign ACLU/Crooks & Liars call for an independent prosecutor

The ACLU and Crooks & Liars have launched a campaign for an independent prosecutor to investigate administration torture. You can read the ACLU’s pdf Ten Reasons Why Congress Should Demand that the Attorney General Appoint an Independent Prosecutor for the Investigation and Prosecution of Any Violations of Federal Criminal Laws Related to the Interrogation of Detainees, Including Any Obstruction of Justice.

Then go sign the call here.

Add comment April 14th, 2008

Waterboarding as team building excercise

Torture isn’t just for the CIA or White House any more. In another sign of the moral degradation of our country, a manager waterboarded an employee as a “team building” exercise, as the Washington Post reports! The legacy of Bush administration torture will run very deep through our culture. No word yet if Richard Cheney or Alberto Gonzales are on the board of this company:

Team-Building or Torture? Court Will Decide.

By Karl Vick

PROVO, Utah — No one really disputes that Chad Hudgens was waterboarded outside a Provo office park last May 29, right before lunch, by his boss.

There is also general agreement that Hudgens volunteered for the “team-building exercise,” that he lay on his back with his head downhill, and that co-workers knelt on either side of him, pinning the young sales rep down while their supervisor poured water from a gallon jug over his nose and mouth.

And it’s widely acknowledged that the supervisor, Joshua Christopherson, then told the assembled sales team, whose numbers had been lagging: “You saw how hard Chad fought for air right there. I want you to go back inside and fight that hard to make sales.”

What’s at issue in the lawsuit Hudgens filed against his former employers — just as in the ongoing global debate over the CIA’s waterboarding of terrorism suspects — is the question of intent.

Prosper Inc. maintains that what the supervisor did, while unauthorized, overzealous and misguided, falls far short of torture, and in fact was not nearly as bad as Hudgens makes out in his quest for damages.

“We’re not the mean waterboarding company that people think we are,” said George Brunt, general counsel for the firm, which sells a combination of online and personalized instruction — packaged as “coaching” and running $3,000 to $15,000 — to customers who are solicited by telephone.

The morning Hudgens said he thought he was going to drown, his team was calling on behalf of “Trump University,” pitching real estate instruction to people who had attended a Trump seminar. Prosper is doing well, with 500 employees and clients in 70 countries, senior executives said in an interview.

“I don’t know if this would even be an issue if it weren’t for Guantanamo Bay,” Brunt said.

“How many times did the CIA even do waterboarding? Three times?” added Dave Ellis, the company president.

“But look at the damage it did to America’s reputation,” Brunt pointed out. “And it’s going to hurt our image.”

Indeed, Hudgens’s lawsuit, filed Jan. 17 in Provo, suggests the testosterone-poisoned setting of the David Mamet play “Glengarry Glen Ross.” Hudgens alleged that if the 10-person sales team went a day without a sale, members had to work the next day standing up; Christopherson took away their chairs. The team leader also threatened to draw a mustache in permanent marker on the face of sales people for “negativity,” Hudgens said. Christopherson kept on his desk a piece of wood, “the 2-by-4 of motivation,” he said.

Brunt and Ellis dispute all this. “When you meet Josh,” Brunt said, “he’s a nice, sensitive guy.”

Hudgens agreed that Christopherson was “an upbeat guy; everybody there likes him.” But he added: “It is a big pressure cooker in there, I’ll tell you.” He said low performers were threatened with “the Cure Team” — two weeks to improve or you’re fired.

Late last May, the all-male sales team was having “a rough week.” Christopherson called the men into the break room and announced, “We’re going to do an exercise.” He asked for a volunteer.

Hudgens raised his hand.

“Keep in mind,” he said, “the last time we did a team-building exercise outside, we did an egg toss.”

Prosper maintains that Christopherson explained what would happen next, and Hudgens knew what he was in for, even handing his cellphone and keys to co-workers before lying down. Hudgens insists he had no clue.

“So they held me down,” Hudgens said, “and the next thing I know, Josh has a gallon jug of water and he’s pouring it on my face. I can’t scream because the water’s going down my throat.

“And halfway through he stopped for a second. I tried to mumble the words, ‘Stop, knock it off.’ I tried to get that out and he continued to pour.”

“I’m not getting any air,” Hudgens said. “Toward the end, I’m starting to black out. I’m getting very dizzy, light-headed. The sensation that’s going through my head is, ‘I’m going to drown.’ ”

That is the oft-described whole point of waterboarding, though Hudgens said he was not then familiar with the word. He said that what he told a friend in the human relations office two hours later, after “coughing, choking, mucus” was: “My team just tried to kill me.”

Only later, after describing the experience to a former employer, was he told: “You’ve just been waterboarded.” “I said, ‘What’s waterboarding?’ And the only difference was, instead of lying on a board, I was lying on a grassy hill.”

Christopherson did not know the term, either, Brunt said: “He thought it had something to do with water skiing.”

He said Christopherson told the executives that he was inspired by reading about the Greek philosopher Socrates, who is said to have once held a student’s head under water, then told him he must want to learn as badly as he wanted air.

“We don’t know what he was thinking, but we know that he wasn’t thinking waterboarding, or torture,” Brunt said. Christopherson, suspended for two weeks while the company investigated the incident, is back on the job. The company declined to allow interviews with him or other employees.

“The sales team leaders are very focused here,” Brunt said. “There was an incident, so it’s not fabricated. There was a training exercise. He did lie down on a hill. The entire exercise lasted less than 20 seconds. A little bit of water was poured and then Josh would stop and say, ‘Are you okay?’

“I can’t say he wasn’t held down, but anybody holding him would have let him up if he’d held his hand up.”

Such details are crucial, not least because under Utah law the case could be relegated to a workers’ compensation claim absent an employer’s “conscious and deliberate intent” to inflict injury.

“And I’m absolutely sure that won’t be found,” Brunt said. “And it’ll be a workers’ comp case, and he’ll get what he needs. But we’re not going to pay to keep it out of the media, though it’s tempting.”

That’s because of the taint of the word, of course. “There’s a debate in the Supreme Court whether it’s torture or not,” Ellis said. “I don’t know, looking at the military filings, it looks pretty torturous.”

Interestingly, Hudgens’s Salt Lake City attorney differs on that. “I’m not an absolutist on that,” Sean Egan said. But “to take these kinds of techniques and apply them to anything but a national security environment is entirely inappropriate.”

And the plaintiff?

“I don’t know if the government should do it or not,” Hudgens said. “But I can tell you firsthand, because it happened to me, it definitely works.

“They didn’t tell me it was going to happen, but if they did, holy cow, I would’ve told them whatever they wanted me to tell them.”

Add comment April 14th, 2008

California legislative resolution targets health providers aiding torture

One of the most exciting new developments in the fight against psychologist and other health provider collusion in torture are bills in several state legislatures on the issue. In California, Senate Joint Resolution 19 is scheduled to come to a vote any day. [See my earlier coverage here, here, and here.] The Sacramento Bee recently covered the issue. [Note: the vote has been delayed several times since this article on April 5.]:

State senator targets torture
By Aurelio Rojas - arojas@sacbee.com

The California Senate is preparing to weigh in on the hot-button topic of torture, with a twist that combines elements of the Hippocratic oath and the military oath.

Under a resolution that state Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas plans to put to a vote Thursday, California regulators would notify physicians and other health professionals that they could lose their license and be prosecuted by the state if they are involved in the torture of suspected terrorists.

The Los Angeles Democrat chairs the Senate Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development, which oversees boards that license health professionals in the state.

During a committee hearing in January, Ridley-Thomas said there is evidence that physicians, psychologists and nurses licensed by the state “have participated in torture or its coverup against detainees in U.S. custody.”

He cited “confirmed reports from the International Red Cross, New England Journal of Medicine, military records and first-person accounts.”

“California has the obligation, I believe, to notify its licensees of laws pertaining to torture that may result in prosecution,” Ridley-Thomas said.

The senator said physicians have reportedly advised interrogators whether prisoners were fit enough to survive “physical maltreatment, informed interrogators about prisoners’ phobias and other psychological vulnerabilities that could be exploited.”

Invoking the Hippocratic oath that physicians traditionally take, he said the state can “withdraw its consent to torture by demanding that its health professionals remember their oath to first do no harm.”

Dr. Vito Imbascini, state surgeon of the California National Guard, said “a few Californians were among the practitioners in the healing arts involved in torture” at U.S. military facilities at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

“But given the tiny number of renegade offenders, we think a more effective approach (than the resolution) would be to target those offenders,” said Imbascini, who represented the 35,000-physician California Medical Association at the hearing.

Neither Senate Republican leader Dick Ackerman nor incoming GOP leader Dave Cogdill was available for comment Friday. But Senate Joint Resolution 19 is likely to provoke spirited debate between Democrats and Republicans in the state Senate, similar to that seen in Congress since 2004 when accounts of abuse, torture, sexual exploitation and homicide at Abu Ghraib came to public attention.

President Bush – with an emphatic “We do not torture” – has defended U.S. interrogation practices and called the treatment of suspected terrorists lawful, despite similar reports of torture at U.S. facilities at Guantánamo and Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.

Bush has repeatedly noted the world has changed dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington and says the United States must defend itself with “enhanced interrogation techniques,” which critics contend is a euphemism for torture.

Over the years, the Legislature has weighed in on complicated national issues over which it has no jurisdiction, such as wars and international treaties. But in this instance, it does appear to have some legal standing.

Dr. Richard Fantozzi, president of the California Medical Board, which licenses physicians, cited a 2005 legal opinion by the state attorney general’s office that concluded the state has jurisdiction over licensees serving in the military or practicing in federal facilities.

Fantozzi said the state Supreme Court has also ruled that a state licensing agency may discipline a licensee for conduct occurring outside the state.

But Fantozzi cautioned the committee that under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, if the military does not cooperate, the state “would be prevented from conducting an effective and thorough investigation.”

Barbara Olshansky, a New York attorney, told the committee “all our military laws and regulations, from the field manual to the manuals on interrogation, prohibit torture.”

She said the U.S. Supreme Court also has affirmed that courts have the responsibility to stop torture.

But Olshansky, who filed the groundbreaking suit in which the Supreme Court ruled that U.S. courts have jurisdiction over claims brought by Guantánamo detainees, said there is ample evidence of torture at U.S. facilities.

“We can prove that medical personnel reviewed detainee medical treatment for serious conditions or allowed treatment only on the condition that they cooperate with interrogators,” said Olshansky, who has assembled a network of 750 attorneys representing Guantánamo detainees.

She alleged American medical personnel have also assisted in drugging detainees during interrogations.

But Imbascini, a colonel in the U.S. Medical Corps, said that during two decades of service he has been responsible for hundreds of detainees and has never witnessed “a single act that could construed as abuse.”

“In fact, I can say quite proudly that the care that I and other Californians rendered to detainees and POWs was identical to that provided our own sick and wounded soldiers,” Imbascini told the committee.

Add comment April 14th, 2008


Pages

Calendar

April 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category