Comments on: New York Times on interrogations controversy http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2008/08/16/new-york-times-on-interrogations-controversy/ Thoughts by Stephen Soldz on war, peace, politics, psychoanalysis, and research methods Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:57:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: katz http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2008/08/16/new-york-times-on-interrogations-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-194134 katz Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:03:47 +0000 http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/?p=1513#comment-194134 It boggles my mind that this is even a debate. You would think it would be common sense to oppose torture as an organization. It boggles my mind that this is even a debate. You would think it would be common sense to oppose torture as an organization.

]]> By: Rachel Port http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2008/08/16/new-york-times-on-interrogations-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-193052 Rachel Port Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:57:06 +0000 http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/?p=1513#comment-193052 Hi Stephen - nice to meet you again in the blogosphere. I've been following this story and posted the APA statement on Daily Kos. So I thought I'd say hello and thank you for the good work. I remember talking to you about the political and psychoanalytic intersecting. Who would have believed we'd end up in this mess? Hi Stephen - nice to meet you again in the blogosphere. I’ve been following this story and posted the APA statement on Daily Kos. So I thought I’d say hello and thank you for the good work. I remember talking to you about the political and psychoanalytic intersecting. Who would have believed we’d end up in this mess?

]]> By: Haaiian style http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2008/08/16/new-york-times-on-interrogations-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-193004 Haaiian style Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:21:10 +0000 http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/?p=1513#comment-193004 Whats the problem. We've shredded the Constititon, we might as well go after medical ethics too. The idea that without psychs present interrogators will do more harm is fatuous. More that waterboarding, shocks, etc. is what death? First do no harm or First do no death. The more things change the more they stay the same. Whats the problem. We’ve shredded the Constititon, we might as well go after medical ethics too.

The idea that without psychs present interrogators will do more harm is fatuous.

More that waterboarding, shocks, etc. is what death?

First do no harm or First do no death.

The more things change the more they stay the same.

]]>