Open Letter to President-Elect Obama: Break With the Dark Side. Do Not Nominate John Brennan as CIA Director

November 24th, 2008

A group of about 200 psychologists and allies has created an Open Letter to President-Elect Obama expressing concerns regarding his rumored consideration of John Brennan to be Director of the CIA. The letter:

**********************

Contact:

Stephen Soldz
ssoldz@bgsp.edu

November 22, 2008

Dear President-Elect Obama,

We are writing to urge you not to select John Brennan as Director of the CIA. We are psychologists and allies who have long opposed the abuses of detainees under the Bush administration. We are just concluding a successful several-year struggle to remove psychologists from their roles in aiding or abetting these abuses. It has been a distressing fact that, while the Bush administration resorted to abuse and torture of those in our custody, often psychologists have been put in positions to use their psychological expertise to guide these unconscionable practices.

We look forward to your administration as an opportunity for genuine change – in this case for our country to take a new direction in its treatment of prisoners. We applaud your commitment to closing Guantanamo and are encouraged by your clear statement from your 60 Minutes interview last Sunday, “America doesn’t torture, and I’m gonna make sure that we don’t torture.” This fuels our hope for a decisive repudiation of the “dark side” – the willingness to use or abet illegal and unethical coercive interrogation tactics that sometimes amount to torture and often constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

We are concerned, however, by reports that you may appoint John Brennan as Director of the CIA. Mr. Brennan served as a high official in George Tenet’s CIA and supported Tenet’s policies, including “enhanced interrogations” as well as “renditions” to torturing countries. According to his own statements, Mr. Brennan was a supporter of the “dark side” policies, wishing only to have some legal justification supplied in order to protect CIA operatives. In describing Director Tenet’s views he stated during a March 8, 2006 Frontline interview:

I think George [Tenet] had two concerns. One is to make sure that there was that legal justification, as well as protection for CIA officers who are going to be engaged in some of these things, so that they would not be then prosecuted or held liable for actions that were being directed by the administration. So we want to make sure the findings and other things were done probably with the appropriate Department of Justice review.

We know, of course, that “the appropriate Department of Justice review” means that torture was authorized and conducted by our government.

The use of these tactics goes against the moral fiber of our country and is never justified. This is true whether these “enhanced interrogation” techniques are used directly by U.S. forces, as in the CIA’s “black sites,” or by other countries acting as our surrogates, as in the “renditions” program where individuals are taken to countries practicing torture, resulting in suffering inflicted by that country’s forces.

We are well aware that these techniques are ineffective as well as immoral. There is extensive evidence that abused detainees are likely to say anything, true or false, to make the pain stop, leading to faulty intelligence. Furthermore, use of torture and other coercive techniques alienates our allies, strengthens the commitment of our enemies, and puts our own captured soldiers at risk.

Earlier this year Mr. Brennan argued in a National Journal interview that a new administration will have great continuity with the Bush-Cheney administration in its intelligence policies:

Even though people may criticize what has happened during the two Bush administrations, there has been a fair amount of continuity. A new administration, be it Republican or Democrat — you’re going to have a fairly significant change of people involved at the senior-most levels. And I would argue for continuity in those early stages. You don’t want to whipsaw the [intelligence] community. You don’t want to presume knowledge about how things fit together and why things are being done the way they are being done. And you have to understand the implication, then, of making any major changes or redirecting things. I’m hoping there will be a number of professionals coming in who have an understanding of the evolution of the capabilities in the community over the past six years, because there is a method to how things have changed and adapted.

In order to restore American credibility and the rule of law, our country needs a clear and decisive repudiation of the “dark side” at this crucial turning point in our history. We need officials to clearly and without ambivalence assert the rule of law. Mr. Brennan is not an appropriate choice to lead us in this direction. The country cannot afford to have him as director of our most important intelligence agencies.

As psychologists and other concerned Americans, we ask you to reject Mr. Brennan as Director of the CIA. His appointment would dishearten and alienate those who opposed torture under the Bush administration. We ask you to appoint a Director who will truly represent “the change we need.”

We eagerly await your administration and the new spirit it represents.

Best wishes for a successful administration,

Sincerely,
* Affiliations for identification purposes only *
Stephen Soldz, Ph.D., Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis & Coalition for an Ethical Psychology

Lorri Greene, Ph.D., Psychologist, San Diego, CA

Frank Summers, Ph.D., ABPP, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Medical School

Ruth Fallenbaum, Ph.D., Berkeley, CA

Neil Altman, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, New York University

Dan Aalbers

Martha Davis, Ph.D., John Jay College of Criminal Justice, NYC

Robert Parker, Ph.D., Member American Psychological Association since 1985
Member Washington State Psychological Association since 1991

Jancis Long, Ph.D., President, Psychologists for Social Responsibility, Member, APA Division 39 Section 9 Psychoanalysts for Social Responsibility, Berkeley, CA

Jean Maria Arrigo, Ph.D., Project on Ethics and Art in Testimony

Steven Reisner, Ph.D., NYU Medical School & Coalition for an Ethical Psychology

Brad Olson, Ph.D., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

Ellen G. Levine, Ph.D., M.P.H., San Francisco State University, Hayward, CA

David Sloan-Rossiter, Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Psychoanalysis & Boston Institute of Psychotherapy

David Ramirez, Ph.D., Swarthmore College

John M. Stewart, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor of Psychology, Northland College, Washburn, WI

Susan Herman, Ph.D., ABPP, New York University Postdoctoral Program, Little Falls, NJ

Susan Phipps-Yonas, Ph.D., L.P., Minneapolis, MN

Coalition for an Ethical Psychology

Muriel Dimen, Ph.D., NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis
Joe Gorin, Ph.D., Washington, DC

Leigh Messinides, Ph.D., Long Beach, CA

Alice Lowe Shaw, Ph.D., San Francisco, CA

Laura L. Doty, Ph.D., Santa Rosa, CA

Susan Rosbrow-Rieich, Ph.D., Psychoanalyst and Psychologist, Faculty Psychoanalytic Institute of New England East, Mass Institute for Psychoanalysis, Psychoanalytic Couple and Family Institute of New England, and Member, Coalition for an Ethical Psychology

Judie Alpert, Ph.D., Faculty and Supervisor, NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, and Professor of Applied Psychology
Department of Applied Psychology, New York University

Donnel B. Stern, Ph.D., William Alanson White Institute

Johanna Tiemann, Ph.D., NYU Postdoctoral Program

Julie Gerhardt, Ph.D., Palo Alto, CA

Ronna Friend, M.A., Eugene, OR

Susan Reese, Ph.D., Arizona Center for Psychoanalytic Studies, Tucson, AZ

Larry Welkowitz, Ph.D., Prof. of Psychology, Keene State College, Keene, NH

James Hopper, Ph.D., Arlington, MA

Philip V. Hull, Ph.D., Psychologist (HI, CA, New Zealand), Faleola Pacific Island Mental Health Services, Otahuhu, Auckland, Aotearoa/New Zealand

Nancy Hollander, Ph.D., Psychologist & Professor Emeritus of Latin American history at California State University

John P. Neafsey, Psy.D., Chicago, IL

Ronnie C. Lesser, Ph.D., Dartmouth Medical College, Hanover, NH

Stephen Sideroff, Ph.D.

Kathleen Malley-Morrison, Ed.D., Boston University, Boston, MA

Irwin Z. Hoffman, Ph.D., Lecturer in Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL

David G. Byrom, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, Co-Director, Family Therapy Institute of Suffolk, Smithtown, NY

Claudia Luiz, M.Ed., Cert. Psya.

Milton Strauss, Research Psychologist, Corrales, NM

David DeBatto, Author/Speaker, U.S. Army Counterintelligence Special Agent (ret.), Tampa, FL

Katie Gentile, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Counseling and Gender Studies, Women’s Center Director, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY

Laurel Bass Wagner, Ph.D., Dallas, TX

Abram Trosky, B.A., MALA., Ph.D. candidate, Boston University, Presidential Teaching Fellow, Political Science Department, Boston, MA

Cynthia Colvin, Ph.D., Oakland, CA

Kathy French, Ed.D., Professor, Behavior Science Department; Coordinator, UVU Martin Luther King, Jr. Commemoration; Utah Valley University

Stefan R. Zicht, Psy.D., Co-Director, Manhattan Institute for Psychoanalysis and President, NY State Psychological Assn Division of Psychoanalysis

Thomas Rosbrow, Ph.D., A.B.P.P., San Francisco, CA

Norbert A. Wetzel, Th.D., Licensed Psychologist and Marriage and Family Therapist, Director, Princeton Family Institute, and Director of Training, Center for Family, Community, and Social Justice, Inc., Princeton, NJ

Rachael Peltz Ph.D., Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California, Berkeley, CA

Lawrence O. Brown, Ph.D., Fellow, Teaching Faculty and Supervisor of Psychotherapy, William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis and Psychology, New York, NY

Drew Tillotson, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist, San Francisco, CA

Lynn Perlman, Ph.D., Newton, MA

Luisa M. Saffiotti, Ph.D., Licensed Psychologist, Chevy Chase, MD

Barbara Eisold, Ph.D., New York, NY

Sharon Gadberry, Ph.D., San Francisco, CA

Anne M. Downes, Ph.D., Hampshire College, Amherst, MA

Arthur J. Eccleston, Psy.D., Chapel Hill, NC
Mark S. Kane, Ph.D., Big Rapids, MI
Cornelia St. John, M.A., MFT, Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California, Oakland, CA

Kristi Schermerhorn, Ph.D., Redmond, WA

Amal Sedky Winter, Ph.D., American University in Cairo

Sarah R. Kamens, M.A., European Graduate School, New York, NY

Sonia Orenstein, Ph.D., New York, NY

Samantha Hoyt, Boston, MA

Melanie Suchet, Ph.D., Executive Editor, Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Dr. Trudy Bond, Private Practice, Toledo, OH

Mary Pelton-Cooper, Psy.D., Licensed Psychologist, Associate Professor, Northern Michigan University

Peter Gumpert, Ph.D., Brookline, MA

Michael O’Loughlin, Ph.D., Adelphi University, NY

Thomas S. Greenspon, Ph.D., LP, LMFT, Minneapolis, MN

Rivkah Lapidus, Ph.D., Somerville, MA

Lynne Layton, Ph.D., Harvard Medical School, Brookline, MA

Patricia Sherman, Ph.D., LCSW, Long Valley, NJ

Elizabeth Hegeman, Ph.D., John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY, and William Alanson White Institute, New York, NY

Kathleen H. Dockett, Ed.D., Psychologists for Social Responsibility

Herb Gingold, Ph.D., Psychologist, New York, NY

Wes Alwan, Somerville, MA

Anthony J. Marsella, Ph.D., Past President (2007-2008), Psychologists for Social Responsibility (Washington, DC), Alpharetta, GA

Leila F. Dane, Ph.D., Executive Director, Institute for Victims of Trauma, McLean, VA

Elaine Gould, Ph.D., Member, APA

Marc Pilisuk, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, The University of California and Professor, Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, Berkeley, CA

Dori Smith, Producer, Talk Nation Radio in CT

Ann D’Ercole, Ph.D., ABPP, NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis

Andrea Cousins, Ph.D., Psy.D., Pioneer Valley Coalition Against Secrecy & Torture, Western Massachusetts & Albany Association for Psychoanalytic Psychology (Local Chapter, Division 39, APA)

Carolyn Hicks, Ed.D.

Frank Marotta, Ph.D.

Thomas Greening, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Saybrook Graduate School and Clinical Professor, UCLA, Private Practice

Barbara Pearson, Ph.D., Westchester Center for the Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy

Barbara C. Greenspon, M.A., Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, Minneapolis, MN

Virginia S. Elliott, Cert. PsyA, Brighton MA

Milton Schwebel, Ph.D., Rutgers University

David Lotto, Ph.D., Licensed Psychologist, Pittsfield, MA

Colleen Cordes, Executive Director, Psychologists for Social Responsibility

Martha A. Nathan, M.D., Baystate Brightwood Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Nina K. Thomas, Ph.D., ABPP, NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis

Stuart A. Pizer, Ph.D., ABPP, Cambridge, MA

M. Brinton Lykes, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Associate Director, Center for Human Rights & International Justice, Boston College

Gemma Marangoni Ainslie, Ph.D., ABPP, Austin, TX

Elaine Gifford, LICSW, Sudbury MA

Virginia Goldner, Ph.D., Adjunct Clinical Professor, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, NY

Lisa Sutton, Ph.D., Director of Clinical Training, Boston Institute for Psychotherapy, Brookline, MA

Polly Scarvalone, Ph.D., New York, NY

Jay Frankel, Ph.D., Adjunct Clinical Associate Professor, New York University

Sue A Shapiro, Ph.D., NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy & Psychoanalysis, New York, NY

Caryn Gorden, Psy.D., New York, NY

Nancy Atlas, Ph.D., New York, NY

Helaine Gold, Ph.D.

Bruce Berman, Ph.D., New York, NY

Andrea Remez, Ph.D., New York, NY

Steven Botticelli, Ph.D., New York, NY

Adrienne E Harris, Ph.D., New York, NY

Lisa Lyons, Ph.D., Teaneck, NJ

Susan Parlow, Ph.D., New York, NY

Jill Salberg, Ph.D., New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, New York, NY

Mary Pike, B.A. Art Institute, ESL Resource Room Supervisor for Highland Park High School, Highland Park, IL

Zeese Papanikolas, M.A., Retired Professor of Humanities

Stephanie Noland, Ph.D., New York, NY

Helaine Gold, Ph.D., NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy & Psychoanalysis
New York, NY

Steven Cooper, Ph.D., Joint Chief Editor, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Cambridge, MA

Laurel E. Phoenix, Ph.D., Public and Environmental Affairs, UWGB, Green Bay, WI

Elizabeth Kandall, Ph.D., New York, NY

Anita R. Herron, Ph.D., New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, New York, NY

Lynne Kwalwasser, Ph.D., Supervisor, NYU Postdoctoral Program, New York, NY

Lynn Leibowitz, Ph.D., New York, NY

Latika Mangrulkar, MSW, ACSW, Steering Committee, Psychologists for Social Responsibility, Santa Rosa, CA

Mary Libbey, Ph.D., New York, NY

Andrew Tatarsky, Ph.D., Founding Executive board member, Division on Addiction and Co-directer, Harm Reduction Psychotherapy and Training Associates

Roanne Barnett, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, New York, NY

Margaret White, Ph.D., Upper Montclair, NJ

Candy Siegel, Ph.D., Tucson, AZ

Zeborah Schachtel, Ph.D., NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, New York, NY

Elizabeth Wolfe, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist, Westport, CT

Judith Merbaum, Ph.D., Great Neck, NY

Amy Schwartz, Ph.D., NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, New York, NY

Cathy S Nelson, MSW, LISW, Ames, IA

Martin Devine, Psy.D., New York University
Amy Schaffer, Ph.D., New York, NY
Nancy Caro Hollander, Ph.D., Los Angeles Institute and Society for Psychoanalytic Studies

Michèle Bartnett

Kate Dunn, Psy. D., Brooklyn, NY

Nancy Freeman-Carroll, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist-Psychoanalyst, William Alanson White Institute, NYSPA, APA, New York, NY

A. Raja Hornstein, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist, San Rafael, CA

Catherine M. Rossiter, LMT, Sayre, PA

Meg Sandow, Psy.D., CA

David Lichtenstein, Ph.D., New York, NY

Richard Reichbart, Ph.D., Institute for Psychoanalytic Training and Research (IPTAR)

Ann Marie Truppi, Ph.D.

Evelyn Pye, Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute for Psychoanalysis, American Psychological Association

Carol Wachs, Psy.D., New York, NY

Katharine G. Baker, Ph.D., Northampton, MA

Judith G. Pott, Ph.D., New York, NY

Glenys Lobban, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, New York, NY

Lisa Fliegel, ATR-BC, LMHC, Boston Institute for Psychotherapy School-based program

Helen Brackett, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, New York, NY

Dara Lyn Petersen, Psychology Student, The George Washington University, Washington, DC

Christine Girard, Ph.D., New York, NY

Andrew Phelps, Ph.D. (mathematics), San Jose City College

Jane Brodwyn, Psy.D., Northampton, MA

Jeanne Wolff Bernstein, Ph.D., PINC

Stephen Benson, Ph.D., Blue Hill, ME

Kirsten Lentz, Ph.D., Candidate, NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, New York, NY

Francia White, Doctoral Candidate, Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis, and Center for Modern Psychoanalytic Studies

Neville D. Frankel, Newton, MA

Arthur J. Lebow, Ph.D., St. Paul, MN

Luise Eichenbaum, LCSW, The Women’s Therapy Centre Institute

William Auerbach, Ph.D., Psychologist

Ken Corbett, Ph.D., Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychology, The New York University Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis

Carol Smaldino, LCSW, Port Washington, NY

Angelo Smaldino, LCSW, Senior Member of National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis, Port Washington, NY

Susan Gutwill, MS, LCSW

Brigitte Ladisch, Ph.D.

Connie Evert, Ph.D., Philadelphia, PA

Quotation Sources:

60 Minutes (November 16, 2003). Obama On Economic Crisis, Transition. Downloaded November 23, 2008 from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/11/16/60minutes/printable4607893.shtml

Frontline. (March 8, 2006). The Dark Side. Downloaded November 23, 2008 from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/interviews/brennan.html

National Journal (March 7, 2008). Q&A with John Brennan: The Counterterror Campaign. Downloaded November 23, 2008 from http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/080307nj1.htm

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized

13 Comments

  • 1. Art Caspary, Ph.D.  |  November 25th, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    I also would like to register my strongest objections to this nomination. It’s time to turn away from all that Brennan represents. I believe that this stance is both moral and pragmatic.

  • 2. Stop the Obama Police State  |  November 25th, 2008 at 2:09 pm

    You must be kidding? Break with the dark side?

    Obama is far worse than Bush could ever be… I mean look at the raft of Clinton criminals that will have a position in his administration.

    Obama is a Marxist and believes in total control of society.

    You must be kidding? The worst is yet to come with this crooked person who we don’t even yet know is a legal citizen of the US.
    Can you spell DICTATORSHIP?

  • 3. Jay Ballou  |  November 25th, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    In addition to the important concerns of this article, psychologists should guide us in understanding and integrating into sane society the sorts of people who write comments like #2.

  • 4. DSG  |  November 25th, 2008 at 6:59 pm

    Why aren’t the doctors and psychologists who participate prosecuted?

  • 5. Stop the WHAT?  |  November 25th, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    “Obama is a Marxist”???
    You’ve GOT to be joking. A Marxist definitely would NOT have appointed über-capitalist free-trader anti-regulator Larry Summers to head the National Economic Council. A Marxist would NOT have voted to bail out the banks. He would have insisted on nationalizing not only the financial sector, but he would have nationalized Exxon-Mobil, ended the Cuba embargo, and thrown the wealthiest Americans in jail, where they belong.
    I *wish* Obama were a Marxist! No such luck… he’s just another corporatist Wall Street whore.

  • 6. Concerned Citizen  |  November 26th, 2008 at 2:37 am

    The most important thing that we need to hear from the Obama administration is that they will reinstate long-standing army regulations and adhere to the Geneva Conventions.

  • 7. Mike  |  November 26th, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    Its a shame the liberals like your coaltition of psychotics and Greenwald condemn people without actually speaking to them. Brennan’s a good man, he would have been an Excellent CIA chief. I’ve known him personally for over 25 years and can say for certain that you libs got it wrong … he doesn’t support or condone torture. According to the blogs that you and Greenwald site his disagreements with the Bush White House on torture cost him advancement in his chosen field.

    As an network news analyst he objectively explains to the media what the types of torture are so then he’s labelled a conspirator by association with the agency that used it??

    He encourages public debate, that’s more than any past CIA director would have said. It’s just a sad day for America when we forget the mission of people like Brennan is to protect this country from all enemies foreign and domestic. Lets get the public debate started people! Brennan’s the right man for the job.

    The man briefed AlGore during the Clinton Administration and because he doesn’t show enough support for a war in Iraq to Cheney he gets removed in favor of someone pushing an administion adgenda! Wake up LIBS!!! He stood on principle and left the CIA because he was blocked for promotion by THE WHITE HOUSE for God sakes. How can you possibly equate that with support of Bush policies and torture? Anyone who had a career in CIA that rose through the ranks during our generation is labelled a Bush croney by you liberals.

    Let’s not forget the mission of the CIA is to defend the USA and your sorry misinformed butts against the true evil that is out there in the world. What about the psychological impacts of 9/11 and televised beheadings by Islamic extremists? Perhaps we should use redention to send the 9/11 mastermind to NEW YORK CITY and let the public decide what constituites torture.

    Brennan got screwed by the Bush administration for not being a puppet and he’s getting screwed again because some liberal nut jobs like your organization, Greenwald and the Atlantic (who never took the time of day to speak to him) blog cry and whine that he IS a puppet and likes to set fire to puppies and kittens.

    The only thing that this did was force the best candidate for change out of the running.

  • 8. Carolyn S. Pooler  |  December 2nd, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Let this new change of administration mean something of value. Lets value human life foriegn and domestic.

  • 9. GLB  |  December 5th, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    I have known John Brennan for over 15 years, and I can tell you that he was the best pick for CIA Director. John is a man of integrity, experience, honesty, highly knowledgeable of the CIA and its inner-workings, and is deeply committed to the well being of this country.

    When I read the uninformed comments made by the list of liberal psychologists, I can only think that they must be backing another candidate of their own chosing, and doing anything possibly to discredit or block other more qualified individuals.

    This seems to be how politics works in our country today. Who cares about all of the facts – let’s just take partial facts, half-truths, and distortions, and float them in the meda to damage the people we do not want to succeed. Just look at how the media and left-wing liberals went after Hilary Clinton, John McCain, Sarah Palin, and others during the Presidential campaign.

    Also, President-Elect Obama should have shown more loyalty to John Brennan than to just accept his letter of withdrawal for the good of a smooth transition. John vigorously supported Senator Obama, and served as his chief Intelligence Advisor during the campaign. John’s advice and the information he supplied to Senator Obama quickly elevated the Senator’s knowledge, giving the perception that he was more of an expert on intelligence matters than in reality.

    I guess, by the standards outlined by the 200 liberal, left-wing psychologists in their letter, anyone who worked for the CIA in the past 8 years should be disqualified from being CIA Director due to their association with the Bush Administration (whether they supported its policies or not). In the end, the post of CIA Director will be a political appointee with few real qualifications, but with political connections. Too bad.

  • 10. Moderate Blogger » &hellip  |  December 6th, 2008 at 10:09 am

    [...] writes about a letter that 200 of the nation’s leading psychologists wrote to Obama yesterday, protesting this nomination. Reviewing Brennan’s statements, they [...]

  • 11. Scott Kean  |  December 7th, 2008 at 1:40 am

    Well, thank God a group of Psychology PhD’s stepped out of the shopping mall and into the war.

    Look, if any one of these two hundred cracked open a history book since their undergrad days they would know that the “dark side” is not a policy of Cheney, Brennan, or Tenet. The dark side is not a “policy” at all. It’s one variable among many other ugly variables in the environmental system of war. The Bush administration, right or wrong, decided to play into it. They did not create the “dark side.”

    Think about it. The Geneva conventions of 1864, 1906, 1929, the Geneva Red Cross Conventions 1949, among other bodies of international law concerning the conduct of war (not to mention international custom) all predated anyone in the outgoing administration. Why were they created? To reign in the dark side policies of an administration that didn’t exist yet? No. They were created to manage a problem that is ancient.

    This letter, endorsed by a bunch of high minded academics seething in righteous indignation, misconstrues a pragmatic statement of a professional. To be concerned with legal justification of CIA operations and the protection of CIA officers carrying out orders indicates regard for their protection. This is pragmatic. Who in the hell would join the CIA if those protections were not in place? How would those operatives who now serve possibly be effective? “The appropriate Department of Justice review” is the legitimate process to ensure that the conduct of the CIA is both appropriate and prudent …and yes legal, which is not so far divorced from morality as the authors of this letter would lead us to believe.

    I sense the concept of prudence is alien, if not anathema, to these 200. If it were not they would be more sober in their proclamations and more realistic in their expectations of government. The Bush administration is leaving but the war environment will remain, limiting options of the incoming administration. I hope that the high expectations of some will not become the detriment of our president elect when he finally takes the reigns of government.

  • 12. Psyche, Science, and Soci&hellip  |  December 8th, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    [...] a fierce reaction from his CIA friends and the press. Some of this reaction can be seen among the comments in response to our Open Letter to Obama on the [...]

  • 13. Dave "knowbuddhau" Parker  |  December 9th, 2008 at 11:00 pm

    Thanks for taking this action. I bow in your virtual directions, all 200 of you.

    I studied psychology at University of Washington in the mid to late 80s. I never gave any consideration to the weaponization of our science. We all bear a shared responsibility for disarming the psychic weapons our colleagues have been building.

    I suggest we adopt the irreducible psyche as our fundamental unit, and stop treating it as a mere machine, susceptible to malicious hacking. Reductionism, for biological systems, died almost 9 years ago.

    Humbled by the Genome’s Mysteries
    Stephen Jay Gould
    http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/19/opinion/19GOUL.html?pagewanted=all&ei=5070&en=87803cb2bf829800&ex=1228971600
    Feb 19, 2001
    “I am no lover, or master, of sound bites or epitomes, but I began by telling my students that we were sharing a great day in the history of science and of human understanding in general….

    “The implications of this finding cascade across several realms. The commercial effects will be obvious, as so much biotechnology, including the rush to patent genes, has assumed the old view that “fixing” an aberrant gene would cure a specific human ailment. The social meaning may finally liberate us from the simplistic and harmful idea, false for many other reasons as well, that each aspect of our being, either physical or behavioral, may be ascribed to the action of a particular gene ‘for’ the trait in question.

    “But the deepest ramifications will be scientific or philosophical in the largest sense. From its late 17th century inception in modern form, science has strongly privileged the reductionist mode of thought that breaks overt complexity into constituent parts and then tries to explain the totality by the properties of these parts and simple interactions fully predictable from the parts. (‘Analysis’ literally means to dissolve into basic parts). The reductionist method works triumphantly for simple systems — predicting eclipses or the motion of planets (but not the histories of their complex surfaces), for example. But once again — and when will we ever learn? — we fell victim to hubris, as we imagined that, in discovering how to unlock some systems, we had found the key for the conquest of all natural phenomena. Will Parsifal ever learn that only humility (and a plurality of strategies for explanation) can locate the Holy Grail?

    “The collapse of the doctrine of one gene for one protein, and one direction of causal flow from basic codes to elaborate totality, marks the failure of reductionism for the complex system that we call biology — and for two major reasons.

    “First, the key to complexity is not more genes, but more combinations and interactions generated by fewer units of code — and many of these interactions (as emergent properties, to use the technical jargon) must be explained at the level of their appearance, for they cannot be predicted from the separate underlying parts alone. So organisms must be explained as organisms, and not as a summation of genes.

    Second, the unique contingencies of history, not the laws of physics, set many properties of complex biological systems….

    “We may best succeed in this effort if we can heed some memorable words spoken by that other great historical figure born on Feb. 12 — on the very same day as Darwin, in 1809. Abraham Lincoln, in his first Inaugural Address, urged us to heal division and seek unity by marshaling the “better angels of our nature” — yet another irreducible and emergent property of our historically unique mentality, but inherent and invokable all the same, even though not resident within, say, gene 26 on chromosome number 12.”


Pages

Calendar

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Recent Posts