Archive for March 26th, 2010

Rendition and torture accountability conference in North Carolina

Here is a video introducing the conference Weaving a Net of Accountability: Taking on extraordinary rendition at the state and regional level at which I will be speaking on Psychology of denial and accountability: breaking through the fog April 8-10 at Duke University. Scott Horton will be the keynote speaker:

Here is the tentative program for the conference [also available as a brochure (pdf):

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Time Event
5:30-6:15pm Interfaith service on torture
View the service’s program (PDF)
Goodson Chapel, Duke Divinity School
6:30-7:15pm Dinner for purchase at the Refectory, Duke Divinity School
7:30 pm Conference keynote address,
The Unresolved Legacy of Guantanamo
by Scott Horton, Contributing Editor of Harper’s Magazine and author of the blog “No Comment”, expert on international law and extraordinary rendition, and lecturer at Columbia Law School

Love Auditorium, Duke University (no charge)

Friday, April 9, 2010

All April 9 events are at John Hope Franklin Center, Room 240, Duke University, and are free and open to the public.

Time Event
8:30-9:00am Continental breakfast
9:00-10:15am Panel 1: North Carolina’s role in the “global spider web” of extraordinary rendition to torture
Gavin Simpson
Perspective of the Council of Europe’s lead investigator on extraordinary rendition (30 min)
Christina Cowger
Evidence assembled in NC and how state and local leaders have reacted (20 min)
Questions (15 min)
10:15-10:30am Coffee break
10:30-12:15pm Panel 2: The Legal Framework of Extraordinary Rendition and Outlook for Restorative Justice
Paula Kweskin, Taiyyaba Qureshi, and Marianne Twu;
A history of international legal norms that protect against extraordinary rendition, obligations under the Convention Against Torture, and how international norms apply to state actors and bystanders (20 min)
Margaret Satterthwaite
Where North Carolina’s hosting of extraordinary rendition flights fits into national and international law on ER (20 min)
Steven Watt
Current status of torture/rendition accountability efforts and their results; state secrets, Alien Tort Act, civil suits (20 min)
Steven Edelstein
Legal obligations of state and local officials (20 min)
Questions (20 min)
12:15-1:30pm Working Lunch. Irish Peace and Neutrality Alliance. ‘, STICKY, WIDTH, 420, FGCOLOR, ‘#d0d0d0′, TEXTCOLOR, ’202020′, ‘#60000000′, BGCOLOR, ‘#600000′, CAPCOLOR, ‘#cccccc’, DELAY, 300, OFFSETX, 0, OFFSETY, 32, CAPTION, ‘Edward Horgan’);” onmouseout=”nd();”>Edward Horgan — Holding the Irish Government accountable for its failures to uphold international laws (30 min)
1:30-2:30pm Panel 3: The Moral Dimension of Extraordinary Rendition
Bisher al-Rawi
by teleconference from UK (25 min)
Stephen Soldz
Psychology of denial and accountability: breaking through the fog (25 min)
Questions (10 min)
2:30-3:45pm Panel 4: Lessons in Accountability
Julia Hall
Amnesty International International rendition/torture accountability movement and where NC fits in (20 min)
Cynthia Brown
Greensboro Truth & Reconciliation Commission Lessons from Greensboro for grassroots accountability work in North Carolina (20 min)
Lisa Magarrell
International Center for Transitional Justice (20 min)
Questions (15 min)
3:45-4:00pm Coffee Break
3:45-5:00pm Roundtable on a North Carolina extraordinary rendition accountability process

  • Chair: Robin Kirk, Director, Duke Human Rights Center
  • 3-4 North Carolina figures, (still in development)
  • Here’s what you can do
5:00-
???
Social hour

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Note: The Saturday program is by invitation only.

9:00am-3:00pm Working meeting to plan Citizens’ Commission of Inquiry, which will create a formal record of North Carolina’s role in extraordinary rendition and produce recommendations to local, state, and federal governments

March 26th, 2010

Wikileaks alleges attack by US and Icelandic intelligence

Wikileaks accuses US and Icelandic intelligence of spying on them. These episodes follow release recently by Wikileaks of a US intelligence report discussing the danger from Wikileaks and advocating measures to disrupt them. After reading this article, show your disdain for this effort to undermine information freedom by going to Wikileaks and contributing either documents or money. They desperately need another $240,000 in order to operate for another year.

On April 5 they plan on releasing a film containing documentation of US troops killing Afghan civilians, they report. Help them have the resources to adequately distribute the film:

U.S. must stop spying on WikiLeaks

By Julian Assange

Fri Mar 26 08:44:46 UTC 2010

Over the last few years, WikiLeaks has been the subject of hostile acts by security organizations. In the developing world, these range from the appalling assassination of two related human rights lawyers in Nairobi last March (an armed attack on my compound there in 2007 is still unattributed) to an unsuccessful mass attack by Chinese computers on our servers in Stockholm, after we published photos of murders in Tibet. In the West this has ranged from the overt, the head of Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, threatening to prosecute us unless we removed a report on CIA activity in Kosovo, to the covert, to an ambush by a “James Bond” character in a Luxembourg car park, an event that ended with a mere “we think it would be in your interest to…”.

Developing world violence aside, we’ve become used to the level of security service interest in us and have established procedures to ignore that interest.

But the increase in surveillance activities this last month, in a time when we are barely publishing due to fundraising, are excessive. Some of the new interest is related to a film exposing a U.S. massacre we will release at the U.S. National Press Club on April 5.

The spying includes attempted covert following, photographing, filming and the overt detention & questioning of a WikiLeaks’ volunteer in Iceland on Monday night.

I, and others were in Iceland to advise Icelandic parliamentarians on the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a new package of laws designed to protect investigative journalists and internet services from spying and censorship. As such, the spying has an extra poignancy.

The possible triggers:

  • our ongoing work on a classified film revealing civilian casualties occurring under the command of the U.S, general, David Petraeus.
  • our release of a classified 32 page US intelligence report on how to fatally marginalize WikiLeaks (expose our sources, destroy our reputation for integrity, hack us).
  • our release of a classified cable from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik reporting on contact between the U.S. and the U.K. over billions of euros in claimed loan guarantees.
  • pending releases related to the collapse of the Icelandic banks and Icelandic “oligarchs”.

We have discovered half a dozen attempts at covert surveillance in Reykjavik both by native English speakers and Icelanders. On the occasions where these individuals were approached, they ran away. One had marked police equipment and the license plates for another suspicious vehicle track back to the Icelandic private VIP bodyguard firm Terr. What does that mean? We don’t know. But as you will see, other events are clear.

U.S. sources told Icelandic state media’s deputy head of news, that the State Department was aggressively investigating a leak from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik. I was seen at a private U.S Embassy party at the Ambassador’s residence, late last year and it is known I had contact with Embassy staff, after.

On Thursday March 18, 2010, I took the 2.15 PM flight out of Reykjavik to Copenhagen–on the way to speak at the SKUP investigative journalism conference in Norway. After receiving a tip, we obtained airline records for the flight concerned. Two individuals, recorded as brandishing diplomatic credentials checked in for my flight at 12:03 and 12:06 under the name of “US State Department”. The two are not recorded as having any luggage.

Iceland doesn’t have a separate security service. It folds its intelligence function into its police forces, leading to an uneasy overlap of policing and intelligence functions and values.

On Monday 22, March, at approximately 8.30pm, a WikiLeaks volunteer, a minor, was detained by Icelandic police on a wholly insignificant matter. Police then took the opportunity to hold the youth over night, without charge–a highly unusual act in Iceland. The next day, during the course of interrogation, the volunteer was shown covert photos of me outside the Reykjavik restaurant “Icelandic Fish & Chips”, where a WikiLeaks production meeting took place on Wednesday March 17–the day before individuals operating under the name of the U.S. State Department boarded my flight to Copenhagen.

Our production meeting used a discreet, closed, backroom, because we were working on the analysis of a classified U.S. military video showing civilian kills by U.S. pilots. During the interrogation, a specific reference was made by police to the video—which could not have been understood from that day’s exterior surveillance alone. Another specific reference was made to “important”, but unnamed Icelandic figures. References were also made to the names of two senior journalists at the production meeting.

Who are the Icelandic security services loyal to in their values? The new government of April 2009, the old pro-Iraq war government of the Independence party, or perhaps to their personal relationships with peers from another country who have them on a permanent intelligence information drip?

Only a few years ago, Icelandic airspace was used for CIA rendition flights. Why did the CIA think that this was acceptable? In a classified U.S. profile on the former Icelandic Ambassador to the United States, obtained by WikiLeaks, the Ambassador is praised for helping to quell publicity of the CIA’s activities.

Often when a bold new government arises, bureaucratic institutions remain loyal to the old regime and it can take time to change the guard. Former regime loyalists must be discovered, dissuaded and removed. But for the security services, that first vital step, discovery, is awry. Congenitally scared of the light, such services hide their activities; if it is not known what security services are doing, then it is surely impossible to know who they are doing it for.

Our plans to release the video on April 5 proceed.

We have asked relevant authorities in the Unites States and Iceland to explain. If these countries are to be treated as legitimate states, they need to start obeying the rule of law. Now.

—Julian Assange (editor@wikileaks.org)

March 26th, 2010


Pages

Calendar

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category