President Bush admits to war crimes
In a speech yesterday, President Bush said:
“Yeah, we waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed,” the former president told a business audience in Grand Rapids, Michigan. “I’d do it again to save lives.”
As the current President and Attorney General have stated that waterboarding is torture, we have the current President and AG refusing to prosecute the admitted criminals, President Bush and Vice President Cheney. As long as this condition persists any pretense that this is “a country of laws and not of men” is ridiculous.
Fortunately, Bush’s comments sparked outrage from some, including some former military officers, as Dan Froomkin reports:
Waterboarding, a form of controlled drowning, is “unequivocably torture”, said retired Brigadier General David R. Irvine, a former strategic intelligence officer who taught prisoner of war interrogation and military law for 18 years.
“As a nation, we have historically prosecuted it as such, going back to the time of the Spanish-American War,” Irvine said. “Moreover, it cannot be demonstrated that any use of waterboarding by U.S. personnel in recent years has saved a single American life.”
Irvine told the Huffington Post that Bush doesn’t appreciate how much harm his countenancing of torture has done to his country….
James P. Cullen, a retired brigadier general in the United States Army Reserve Judge Advocate General’s Corps, told HuffPost that the net effect of Bush’s remarks — and former Vice President Cheney’s before him — is “to establish a precedent where it will be permissible to our enemies to use waterboarding on our servicemen in future wars….
“This is not the last war we’re going to fight,” Cullen said. “Americans not yet born are going to be prisoners of war in those conflicts. And our enemies are going to be able to point back to President Bush and Vice President Cheney saying that waterboarding is OK.
“It’s just shocking to me how he can be so flip about something that is so serious,” Cullen said.
Matthew Alexander, the pseudonymous former Air Force interrogator and author of “How To Break A Terrorist” e-mailed HuffPost that Bush’s statement “is de facto approval of the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of American soldiers in Iraq who were killed by foreign fighters that Al Qaida recruited based on the President’s policy of torture and abuse of detainees.
“At least now we know where the blame for those soldiers’ deaths squarely belongs. President Bush’s decision broke with a military tradition dating back to General George Washington during the Revolutionary War and the consequences are clear: Al Qaida is stronger and our country is less safe.”
Is it now policy that criminals won’t be prosecuted as long as they brag about their crimes? Or is it simply that the powerful can commit and brag of their crimes with impunity?
June 4th, 2010