Archive for October 12th, 2011

In Boston, democracy worth less than sports

For Boston officials, democracy worth less than sports. We’ve never heard them say that the Red Sox have to go since they’re bankrupting the city. But the city simply can’t afford free speech. Let them watch balls!

The cost of policing the Occupy Boston encampment in Dewey Square is starting to worry some local officials:

City Council President Steve Murphy, who chairs the council’s Public Safety Committee, said a multimillion-dollar overtime tab could be a devastating blow as the city struggles with its fragile bottom line.“It’s a lot of money, and you’ve got a tough economy for the city to deal with,” Murphy said. “We just can’t let this thing continue and have it potentially break the backs of the public treasury here in the city of Boston. We’ve been adversely impacted by the downturn in the economy as well.”

Murphy said top Boston Police Department brass estimate the OT bill for the protests could come in at up to $2 million if demonstrators continue to live in the tent city on Dewey Square through Oct. 31. BPD spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll said the department had no official estimates yet of the overtime cost. She also said it’s too early to know what impact the protests will have on the BPD’s tight budget.

 

What’s odd about this two million dollar figure is that it’s identical to the number New York City is throwing around. I am surprised that the New York number is so low and the Boston number so high. At the Occupy Wall Street events a large police presence has clashed frequently with the protesters while in Boston there has been just one instance of alarge police action.

If the cost for these protests pans out as projected it would place the Occupy Boston “event” in the same neighborhood as some of the major sporting events the city has hosted in the last decade. The 2008 Celtics parade alone cost $380,000 to police. The estimated cost of just the 2004 Red Sox parade was over $750,000, though much of the cost was picked up by private business in exchange for sponsorship opportunities. The 2007 Red Sox World Series run cost the city approximately $1.5 million, only $684,516 of that was covered by the Red Sox and private business, leaving the city on the hook for $815,484.

Watch for cost concerns to be a talking point against these protests as they continue.

 

October 12th, 2011

New Yorker on Occupy Boston

Ian Crouch reports on Occupy Boston for the New Yorker.

October 12th, 2011

Statement by one of those arrested at Occupy Boston Monday morning

Here is a statement by one of those arrested in “Cradle of Liberty” Boston in the middle of the night on orders of Mayor Menino, who is determined to snuff out “civil disobedience” in his city. He would have been with the Tories in revolutionary Boston:

Police Attack Occupy Boston, Arresting 141 Peaceful Protestors

[feel free to forward this WIDELY]

Brothers and sisters,
I want to tell to you what happened to me on Monday night into early Tuesday morning and explain what it means for the movement.

Monday afternoon, the mass march of thousands of students and workers joined by MassUniting and the Right to the City Alliance culminated in a demonstration at the park square just north of Dewey Square, across the street.

We decided in a General Assembly style mass meeting to occupy and hold this second park square, which was merely the logical and geographical dimension of the expansion of our peaceful protest movement.  The director of the Rose Kennedy Greenway(RKG) told the Assembly that they respected freedom of speech, and that the North Square had recently undergone renovation of the grass and gardens that she wanted preserved. She implied that if we would respect the greens, and work to restore them later if necessary, then there wouldn’t be a problem.

But the Mayor had a problem: he doesn’t want our movement to grow and expand in any way shape or form. His office reportedly said that if we didn’t leave by midnight, then he would arrest everyone in the square. This was apparently to happen regardless of whether we had permission from the RKG and regardless of our right to freedom of assembly and our peaceful nature.

Waiting till cover of darkness and minimum public scrutiny, the police began their attack at around 1:45am. I watched as they marched into the front line of our peaceful perimeter, which was composed of mostly-elderly war veterans from Veterans for Peace, who were all wielding white flags with a dove and olive branch on them. Some were tackled to the ground, others choke-slammed before being hog-tied with plastic and thrown in the wagon. See with your own eyes in the videos below.

I was arrested shortly thereafter (around 2am), luckily not roughed up, or thrown on the ground, or scratched in the face in the way that many others I saw were. They put me in a wagon and took eight of us to a holding station in West Roxbury.  After about 6 hours, I did get half a cup of water and one phone call but they took my shoes before I re-entered the cell after booking. Then I was confined to a cold cell with no food and, now, no shoes for another 7 hours. Though it doesn’t compare to conditions in Guantanamo Bay, being confined in a cold cell with no food for 13 hours seems to me to be rather cruel and inhumane treatment for peaceful protestors.

Around 3pm (I think) they took us to a the courthouse in Government Center, and offered us a plea deal to move from criminal charges of “unlawful assembly” and “trespassing” to a civil “parking-ticket-type” fine of $50. Some took the deal, others pleaded not guilty and will go to trial in a few weeks.

I got out of jail around 5pm, after a 15 hour ordeal, only to find out that Menino had ordered the square not only to be cleared of people, but cleared of all our property and possessions. Personally, I lost my tent, two sleeping bags, a large comforter and pillow, and a box of DVDs that were given to me for the purpose of creating an educational film series for Occupy Boston. They took ALL the tents and belongings, destroyed them and put them in a trash truck and hauled them away.

What does this mean?

First of all, SHAME ON THE BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT for their cruel and inhumane treatment of prisoners.

Second of all, SHAME ON MAYOR MENINO for his violent attack on the peaceful protest and his destructive clearing of ALL of our personal property from the Northern Square.

Let us be CLEAR: the top 1% and those with all the money and power, are represented by the Mayor’s office, and it is THEIR interests who the police are here to ‘protect and serve’. Not ours. They want to scare us into submission, and prevent the expansion of this movement.

So our response to these attacks on freedom of speech, assembly, and political dissent should be clear and simple:
We need to DOUBLE and RE-DOUBLE our efforts to DEEPEN and BROADEN this movement.

Every campus, every community organization, every labor union, and every neighborhood needs to know what why we’re here (to protest and organize alternatives to corporate domination of our lives) and how they can PARTICIPATE in changing society with us (join a committee, spread the word, donate supplies!).

Thanks for your support, as evidenced by the MASS turnout at last night’s General Assembly. KEEP IT COMING.

We hope to see you in the Square!

Solidarity forever,
Brian


Other videos of the police attack:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5G9agQjM60

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/occupy-boston-protesters-arrested/2011/10/11/gIQAsCzWdL_video.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s3zFca5znU&feature=relmfu

October 12th, 2011

University of Pennsylvania Faculty support Occupy Wall Street

As far as I am aware, this is the first statement of support from a university faculty. We hope its not the last. [I notice that no psychology faculty signed. Sad.]

Statement of solidarity from University of Pennsylvania Faculty

As faculty members at the University of Pennsylvania, we wish to express our solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement now underway in our city and elsewhere. This movement expresses widespread anger with the economic and political disenfranchisement of the great majority of the American people. Occupy Wall Street is protesting a system that provides increasingly few opportunities for the majority –– the 99% –– while generating vast profits for a tiny minority. Along with the demonstrators, we are demanding an end to the extreme inequalities that structure our society.  We share with many Americans acute anger at the government’s unconditional bailout of bankers and Wall Street firms that drove the economy to disaster. Our country urgently needs to address not the problems of Wall Street but the problems of the 99%:  massive unemployment of the American people, the erosion of our social safety networks, our decaying infrastructures, social and education programs, and workers’ wages, rights, and benefits. We oppose the undemocratic collusion of big business with government at all levels. We join Occupy Wall Street in calling for urgent action to increase employment and to protect programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, in part by requiring the wealthy, the investment bankers, and the large corporations to pay their fair share of taxes. We also join the protesters in decrying the disastrous effects of the costly, unjustified wars that the United States has been conducting overseas since 2001.  Only by identifying the complex interconnections between repressive economic, social, and political regimes can social and economic justice prevail in this country and around the globe. We applaud the efforts to keep the protests peaceful and democratic. As teachers we express our conviction that without social justice, education is a shell game. And as scholars we celebrate the creative and intellectual work of Occupy Wall Street as an essential partner to our own efforts to facilitate the emergence of a better social order and a smarter commitment to its lively perpetuation. We join our colleagues in the labor movement, especially teachers unions, and at other universities and colleges, in supporting this movement. We call on all members of the Penn community to lend their support to this peaceful and potentially transformative movement.

Ania Loomba, English

Suvir Kaul, English

Anne Norton, Political Science

Charles Bernstein, English

Toorjo Ghose Social, Policy and Practice

Robert Vitalis, Political Science

Zachary Lesser, English

Deborah Thomas, Anthropology

Max Cavitch, English

Andrea Goulet, French

Jed Esty, English

Timothy Corrigan, Cinema Studies, English, and History of Art

John Richetti, English Emeritus

Marcia Ferguson, Theater Arts

Chi-ming Yang, English

Nicola M. Gentili, Cinema Studies

Eve Troutt Powell, History and Africana Studies

Katie L. Price, English

Rita Barnard, English

Lisa Mitchell, South Asia Studies

Salamishah Tillet, English

Thadious Davis, English

Kathleen Hall, Graduate School of Education

Amy Kaplan, English

Herman Beavers, English

Jim English, English

Phyllis Rackin, English Emerita

Jean-Michel Rabate, English

Heather Love, English

Marie Gottschalk, Political Science

Bob Perelman, English

Andrew Lamas, Urban Studies

Karen Beckman, History of Art / Cinema Studies

Nancy Bentley, English

Nancy J. Hirschmann, Political Science

Demie Kurtz, Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies

Shannon Lundeen, Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies

Michelle Taransky, English

David L. Eng, English

Michael Leja, History of Art and Visual Studies

Tsisti Jaji, English

Yin-Ling Wong, Social Policy & Practice

Mark Stern, Social Policy & Practice

Dennis Culhane, Social Policy & Practice

Tukufu Zubeiri, Sociology

Nina Auerbach, English Emerita

David S. Roos, Biology

Tulia Falleti, Political Science

Projit Mukharji, History and Sociology of Science

E. Ann Matter, Religious Studies

Jamal Elias, Religious Studies

Toni Bowers, English.

Devan Patel, South Asian Studies

Julia Lynch, Political Science

Ezekiel Dixon-Roman, Social Policy & Practice

Roberta Iversen, Social Policy & Practice

Michele Richman, French

David Kazanjian, English

Tamara J. Walker, History

Christopher Nichols. History

Andrea Doyle, Social Policy & Practice

Sharon Ravitch, Graduate School of Education

Cheikh Babou, History

James Ker,  Classical Studies

Emily Wilson, English

Gwendolyn DuBois Shaw, History of Art

Nuzhat Ahmad, Medicine

Bethany Wiggin, German

Josephine Parks, English

Steven Hahn, History

Devin Griffiths, English

Lydie Moudileno, French

Virginia Chang, Medicine

Margreta de Grazia, English

Emma Dillon, Music

Rahul Mangharam, of Electrical and Systems Engineering

Damon Freeman, Social Policy & Practice

Karin Rhodes, Social Policy & Practic

 

1 comment October 12th, 2011

Elizabeth Warren saying what’s on her mind.

Starring: Molly Erdman
Directed by: Brian Shortall
Written/Produced by: Eddie Geller
Edited by: Richard Klopfenstein

October 12th, 2011

The state at work

October 12th, 2011


Pages

Calendar

October 2011
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category