Posts filed under 'SERE'

The Torture Report: What the Documents Say About America’s Post-9/11 Torture Program

An important forthcoming book The Torture Report: What the Documents Say About America’s Post-9/11 Torture Program described by the author:

The “war on terror,” brought to light by Freedom of Information Act litigation. As the lead author of the ACLU’s report on these documents, Larry Siems is in a unique position to chronicle who did what, to whom and when. This book, written with the pace and intensity of a thriller, serves as a tragic reminder of what happens when commitments to law, common sense, and human dignity are cast aside, when it becomes difficult to discern the difference between two groups intent on perpetrating extreme violence on their fellow human beings.

Divided into three sections, The Torture Report presents a stunning array of eyewitness and first-person reports—by victims, perpetrators, dissenters, and investigators—of the CIA’s White House-orchestrated interrogations in illegal, secret prisons around the world; the Pentagon’s “special projects,” in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba; plots real and imagined, and much more.

January 9th, 2012

Speaking on Bradley Manning’s treatment next Wednesday

I will speak at a forum on the treatment of Bradley Manning at Boston University next Wednesday. Also speaking is Manning friend David House:

Event Description: Boston University’s Amnesty International Chapter will be hosting an event about the US soldier, Bradley Manning, who allegedly leaked classified documents to Wikileaks. Manning is currently being held under conditions many have deemed solitary confinement. He has been required to stay in his cell for 23 hours a day with no blanket or pillow and is not allowed to exercise in the confines of his cell. Recently, Manning has been forced to strip naked and give up his clothes for the duration of the night. The soldier Pfc. Bradley Manning’s close friend and regular visitor, David House, and psychologist and activist Dr. Stephen Soldz will discuss the current conditions of Manning’s detainment. Dr. Stephen Soldz, a professor at the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis and the founder of Psychoanalysts for Peace and Justice, will be speaking. Dr. Soldz has been featured on Democracy Now! and other news media as an outspoken critic of torture.
Date: Wednesday, March 23
Time: 6:00pm – 8:00pm
Location: Boston University College of General Studies Room 505, 871 Comm Ave

There are many other events, including 20+ rallies this weekend, to support Manning. Check them out here.

 

 

 

March 16th, 2011

White House pressures PJ Crowley to resign over Manning comments

The Obama administration today made commitment to prisoner abuse a central pillar of its policies. State Department spokesperson P. J. Crowley has abruptly resigned after intense pressure from a White House furious that he criticized the Defense Department’s abuse of Bradley Manning. With this action the Obama administration has signaled its continuity with the Bush administration program of abuse.

Alas, there are fewer and fewer people of conscience, like Crowley, left in this administration. As Crowley said in a statement today:

The exercise of power in today’s challenging times and relentless media environment must be prudent and consistent with our laws and values.

These are not the sentiments of someone who can survive in the current lawless administration, just as such a person couldn’t survive in the lawless Bush administration. Those who believe in human rights have been driven out by Obama’s flunkies who think that the only reason to be in power are to get reelected while handing the country over to Wall Street and the military-intelligence establishment.

Crowley resigns as State Department spokesman

By CNN Senior White House Correspondent Ed Henry

WASHINGTON (CNN) – P.J. Crowley abruptly resigned Sunday as State Department spokesman over controversial comments he made about the Bradley Manning case.

Sources close to the matter the resignation, first reported by CNN, came under pressure from the White House, where officials were furious about his suggestion that the Obama administration is mistreating Manning, the Army private who is being held in solitary confinement in Quantico, Virginia, under suspicion that he leaked highly classified State Department cables to the website Wikileaks.

Speaking to a small group at MIT last week, Crowley was asked about allegations that Manning is being tortured and kicked up a firestorm by answering that what is being done to Manning by Defense Department officials “is ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid.”

Crowley did add that “nonetheless, Bradley Manning is in the right place” because of his alleged crimes, according to a blog post by BBC reporter Philippa Thomas, who was present at Crowley’s talk.

“The unauthorized disclosure of classified information is a serious crime under U.S. law,” Crowley said in a statement Sunday. “My recent comments regarding the conditions of the pre-trial detention of Private First Class Bradley Manning were intended to highlight the broader, even strategic impact of discreet actions undertaken by national security agencies every day and their impact on our global standing and leadership.

“The exercise of power in today’s challenging times and relentless media environment must be prudent and consistent with our laws and values,” Crowley said. “Given the impact of my remarks, for which I take full responsibility, I have submitted my resignation.”

Crowley has told friends that he is deeply concerned that mistreatment of Manning could undermine the legitimate prosecution of the young private. Crowley has also made clear he has the Obama administration’s best interests at heart because he thinks any mistreatment of Manning could be damaging around the world to President Obama, who has tried to end the perception that the U.S. tortures prisoners.

Nevertheless, Crowley’s political fate was sealed on Friday when Obama was asked at a White House news conference about his comments regarding Manning.

Obama revealed that he had asked Pentagon officials “whether or not the procedures that have been taken in terms of (Manning’s) confinement are appropriate and are meeting our basic standards.”

In a comment that drew howls of protest from liberals, Obama added that Pentagon officials “assure me that they are. I can’t go into details about some of their concerns, but some of this has to do with Private Manning’s safety as well.”

Manning’s treatment has become a flashpoint for liberals, with Amnesty International noting he has been confined to a windowless cell for 23 hours a day, is stripped down to his boxers at night and is not given pillows or blankets.

Manning’s lawyer also says the young private recently had to sleep in the nude because defense officials thought there was a suicide threat and decided to take away his boxer shorts.

Crowley is highly respected on foreign policy matters, dating back to his time as National Security Council spokesman under then-President Bill Clinton. He has been the Obama administration’s public face on many international stories as the daily briefer at the State Department for Secretary Hillary Clinton.

But he has not had a completely smooth relationship with officials in the Obama White House, and eyebrows were raised several months ago when White House aide Mike Hammer was sent over to the State Department to serve as Crowley’s deputy.

Hammer will replace Crowley as the assistant secretary for public affairs, Hillary Clinton said in a statement Sunday.

She said she accepted Crowley’s resignation “with regret.”

“P.J. has served our nation with distinction for more than three decades, in uniform and as a civilian,” she said. “His service to country is motivated by a deep devotion to public policy and public diplomacy, and I wish him the very best.”

A little-known factor in Crowley’s comments about Manning was revealed Saturday by April Ryan, a White House correspondent for American Urban Radio who covered Crowley in the Clinton White House.

Ryan wrote on Twitter that Crowley “dislikes treatment of prisoners as his father was a Prisoner of War.”

While it’s true that Crowley’s father was imprisoned during World War II, people close him downplay that as a major factor in his comments about Manning, saying the biggest factor is simply that Crowley believes what he said.

Asked to comment on Crowley stepping down, Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the National Security Council, referred questions to the State Department.

In the statement, Crowley said he leaves with “great admiration and affection” for his colleagues and “deep respect for the journalists who report on foreign policy and global developments every day, in many cases under dangerous conditions and subject to serious threats. Their efforts help make governments more responsible, accountable and transparent.”

 

 

 

March 13th, 2011

Coalition Launches Online Timeline Chronicling 9/11 Decade of U.S. Torture and Detainee Abuse, With Emphasis on Psychologists and APA

The Coalition for an Ethical Psychology, of which I’m a founder, has just issued a new Timeline documenting the involvement of psychologists and torture. Here is our Press Release:

Coalition Launches Online Timeline Chronicling 9/11 Decade of U.S. Torture and Detainee Abuse

Psychologist and American Psychological Association Involvement Highlighted

www.ethicalpsychology.org/timeline

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, March 7, 2011

CONTACT: Stephen Soldz

The Coalition for an Ethical Psychology today announces the release of an interactive online Timeline (www.ethicalpsychology.org/timeline) detailing the roles of psychologists in the torture and unethical treatment of national security detainees over the years since the 9/11 attacks. The Timeline also constitutes the most comprehensive record of the partnership between the American Psychological Association (APA) and the U.S. national security sector in expanding and legitimizing torture and abuse.

The Coalition’s Timeline speaks to diverse audiences: human rights scholars, policymakers, health professionals, social scientists, military ethicists and intelligence professionals, educators, journalists, social activists, churches, and conscientious citizens.  It brings together information which otherwise is only available through hundreds of separate sources.

As the Timeline reveals, the psychology profession is directly implicated in the U.S. government’s program of torture and detainee abuse as psychologists designed, implemented, monitored, and researched the torture program. Furthermore, the APA was complicit in these abuses by providing crucial political and ethical support for psychologist involvement in coercive interrogations.

The Coalition Timeline, which currently has over 350 entries, is fully searchable and will be regularly updated as new information becomes available. Suggestions for additional events to include are welcome at timeline@ethicalpsychology.org.

We encourage you to share the webpage (www.ethicalpsychology.org/timeline) with colleagues, listservs, and other groups and individuals to whom it may be of interest.

Please also read the Coalition’s statement: “Reclaiming Our Profession: Psychology Ten Years After 9/11″.

 

The Coalition for an Ethical Psychology is dedicated to putting psychology on a firm ethical foundation in support of social justice and human rights. The Coalition has been in the lead of efforts to remove psychologists from torture and abusive interrogations.

 

 

 

 

March 7th, 2011

Wikileaks adds evidence to claims of Americans tortured by US forces in Iraq

One of the cases that clearly indicated the extent to which prisoner abuse by US forces was rampant  in Iraq was the case of Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel, two US whistleblowers who discovered that their employer was bribing troops to obtain arms that were then sold locally. They were held against their will by their employer. When they were rescued by US troops and told US officials of their suspicions, they were themselves imprisoned and tortured in Camp Cropper, one of the notorious US prisons in Iraq. Vance and Ertel are now suing Donald Rumsfeld for authorizing the torture regime to which they were subjected.

An Iraqi blogger pouring over the Wikileaks Iraq War Logs release has found a document that confirms much of Vance and Ertel’s story. Maximilian Forte, at Zero Anthropology has an account. After describing the Vance-Erbil case, he explais the role of the Wikileaks document:

[T]he Wikileaks Iraq War Logs contain a document that lends weight to their claims. That document states that two American civilians were being held captive in a compound and were rescued by coalition forces, and that a large weapons cache had also been found. These two Americans are identified as employees of Shield Group Security, held by SGS against their will. The document also states that the weapons cache belonged to SGS–there is no mention of any suspicion that wrongly connected Vance and Ertel with that stockpile, like their later accusers would allege. SGS is classed in the document by the U.S. Embassy as a “bad employer.”

Forte goes on to conclude:

Perhaps even more shocking and unbelievable is that anyone would dare to argue that the Wikileaks disclosures were a “bad” thing, when such critical information about various crimes–as must be disclosed, and prosecuted–is now receiving attention. Arguing against the leaks is arguing to cover up crimes.

November 14th, 2010

NYT covers ethics complaint against against torture psychologist Mitchell

The New York Times has finally covered last June’s ethics complaint against the CIA’s torture psychologist James Mitchell. BTW, the American Psychological Association is quoted as supporting the complaint against Mitchell. What is left out is the APA’s deep complicity with Mitchell and his activities, as detailed here and here.

Psychologist in Terror War Is Subject of Complaint

By Morgan Smith

The decision about whether an architect of Bush-era interrogation tactics will keep his license as a psychologist is in the hands of a Texas government agency.

A complaint against Dr. James E. Mitchell is now before the Texas State Board of Psychologists, alleging that he violated the profession’s rules of practice in helping the C.I.A. develop “enhanced interrogation techniques” for use in its so-called black prison sites during the Bush administration’s war on terror. Along with Dr. Bruce Jessen, a fellow military psychologist, Dr. Mitchell was a primary developer of post-Sept. 11 C.I.A. interrogation methods that are currently under a criminal torture investigation by the Department of Justice.

Dr. Mitchell, who did not respond to repeated requests for comment for this article, parlayed his experience in training American soldiers to survive as prisoners of war into a lucrative consulting business with the C.I.A. He orchestrated — and, according to the complaint, participated in — the harsh interrogation of terror suspects using sexual humiliation and the drowning technique called waterboarding.

Joseph Margulies, a Northwestern University law professor, and Dicky Grigg, an Austin lawyer, worked with a Texas psychologist, Jim L. H. Cox, to bring the complaint, which documents in lurid detail Dr. Mitchell’s role in the questioning of prisoners.

The complaint, which was brought in June, alleges that the doctor misrepresented his qualifications to the C.I.A., placing “his own career and financial aspirations above the safety of others” while designing a “torture regime” with a “complete lack of scientific basis.”

Mr. Margulies said he was pursuing the possibility of a similar action against Dr. Jessen, who is licensed in Idaho.

Mr. Margulies said Dr. Mitchell had never practiced psychology in Texas although through the years, he had maintained his license here and renewed it.

The severity of the accusations led the American Psychological Association to take the rare step of submitting a public comment to the Texas licensing board. The group’s letter said that if Dr. Mitchell were a member of the professional association — he is not — and if the accusations were true, he would be expelled.

The association’s ethics guidelines prohibit inhumane or abusive treatment of anyone, and there “are no circumstances in which that isn’t the case,” including wartime or threat of terrorism said Rhea Farberman, a spokeswoman.

A spokeswoman for the Texas board said she could not comment on the complaint, saying only that the board had yet to take disciplinary action against Dr. Mitchell, a process that typically takes about six months.

Mr. Margulies emphasized the board members’ importance in the process , calling them the “only gatekeepers” of the profession.

“They are either up to the challenge or not. This is their responsibility,” he said. “There is a psychologist out there who did these things. There’s no credible question about whether they happened. It’s been confirmed over and over again. And so the question is whether it matters.”

msmith@texastribune.org

November 14th, 2010

Interview with Mark Benjamin on Martin Seligman, resilience, and torture

Last Thursday Mark Benjamin reported in Salon about psychologist and former American Psychological Association President Martin Seligman’s receiving a $31 million sole-source, no bid contract. The Coalition for an Ethical Psychology issued a press release that I posted here expressing concerns that the contract may be connected to possible service rendered by Seligman to the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” torture program. Here is an interview with Benjamin on his article:

October 17th, 2010

Coalition for an Ethical Psychology Calls for Investigation of Allegations Concerning Martin Seligman, Denounces APA Inaction

NOTE: A PDF of the press release below is available HERE.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, October 14, 2010

Today, Mark Benjamin in Salon.com reports that former American Psychological Association (APA) President Martin Seligman received a no-bid, $31 million contract from the Department of Defense (DOD) for “resilience training” of soldiers.

Dr. Seligman is known to have presented his research on learned helplessness to a group of CIA interrogators and psychologists, including James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, who were developing the CIA’s torture program at the time of the presentation. Mitchell and Jessen have acknowledged incorporating Seligman’s ideas, including forcing at least one detainee into a “dog box” to induce helplessness.

The Coalition for an Ethical Psychology calls for an immediate independent investigation into the awarding of this contract without a standard and usually required bidding process. We are especially concerned that a psychologist who apparently instructed CIA interrogators is alleged to have received special treatment from the Defense Department.

And in a separate article, also released today, Jason Leopold and Jeffrey Kaye allege that another former APA President, Patrick DeLeon, was part of a Pentagon briefing on a highly classified Special Access Program involving detainee interrogations that centered on “deception detection.” They also report that such a program was implemented at Guantanamo, experimenting on detainees to improve “deception detection” methods.

Seligman and DeLeon are only the latest psychologists alleged to have connections to what became the government’s “enhanced interrogation” programs. Previously, a third former APA President, Joseph Matarazzo, was revealed to be a board member of the contractor firm that designed and implemented the CIA’s torture program, Mitchell Jessen & Associates (Matarazzo has also been reported by the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer to have been on the CIA’s Professional Standards Board.) Today’s revelations raise the question of ongoing involvement of the APA leadership at its highest levels.

The APA, the world’s largest professional organization of psychologists, has consistently failed to exercise vigilance regarding possible participation of its members and other psychologists in torture and other unethical treatment of detainees. While abstractly denouncing torture, the organization has adopted policies protecting and systematically deflecting attention from the complicit roles of psychologists (see accompanying Fact Sheet). Concerns were first raised in 2008 about Seligman’s potential involvement in the interrogation program. The APA immediately issued an unequivocal denial of Seligman’s role: “Dr. Martin Seligman has confirmed to the APA that the allegation surfacing on various blogs that he provided assistance in the process of torture is completely false.” Common sense alone should preclude the acceptance of unsubstantiated denials by people accused of abuses as “confirmation.”

For several years the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology and other psychological and human rights organizations have called for the APA to confront the role of psychologists and the Association itself in the torture program, and to reform the Association in a manner that provides transparency and accountability. But the APA continues to stonewall such efforts. It has failed to act in good faith when confronted with credible evidence of abuses by psychologists and of irregularities in APA’s own actions.

We call upon all psychologists to forcefully express their concerns to the American Psychological Association regarding its accommodation of a state-sanctioned program of abuse, as well as the role of its leadership in supporting the programs of abuse. We also call upon the Defense Department Inspector General to investigate allegations that Martin Seligman was given special treatment in the no-bid award of $31 million for resilience training.

The Coalition for an Ethical Psychology is dedicated to putting psychology on a firm ethical foundation in support of social justice and human rights. The Coalition has been in the lead of efforts to remove psychologists from torture and abusive interrogations.

Contacts:

Steven Reisner
drreisner@gmail.com

Stephen Soldz

October 16th, 2010

Doctors of the Dark Side

Psychologist Martha Davis is working on a documentary, Doctors of the Dark Side, for which I was interviewed last spring. The film is set for commercial release in December. But Davis has just announced a web site. Go there and watch the trailer and, if so moved, give them some $s.

August 2nd, 2010

Raymond: Making the Link – The Inside Story of How Health Professionals Designed the U.S. Regime of Torture

One of the highlights of the recent Psychologists for Social Responsibility (PsySR) conference was the keynote address by Nathaniel Raymond of Physicians for Human Rights entitled Making the Link: The Inside Story of How Health Professionals Designed the U.S. Regime of Torture. Thanks to Roy Eidelson, PsySR’s Past President, the talk is now available on Youtube in five parts:

Part One:

Part Two:

Part Three:

Part Four:

Part Five:

July 27th, 2010

Previous Posts


Pages

Calendar

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category